Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
Unfortunately, that was not the case. They were tortured simply for the enjoyment of the guards.

If any of them had time-critical info, they would have been drugged under controlled circumstances and interrogated there, securely. The folks doing it would SURE AS HELL not have allowed some bunch of ciggarette-smoking peanut galleries to film it for their amusement.

Do yourself a favor and read the Pentagon report. Then wash your hands.

47 posted on 05/08/2004 11:34:59 PM PDT by Long Cut ("Fightin's commenced, Ike, now get to fightin' or get outta the way!"...Wyatt Earp, in Tombstone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Long Cut
"They were tortured simply for the enjoyment of the guards."


That's what the investigation is supposed to determine and punish those responsible.

But as I said, releasing the pictures puts American lives at risk and serves no positive purpose.

There was much that was not allowed to be published during WW II, because it was deemed that "the people's right to know" was outweighed by the danger to the success of the mission and American and coalition lives.

If the media had a reponsible bone in their body, they wouldn't have published the pictures. The information was already public.
49 posted on 05/08/2004 11:38:37 PM PDT by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson