To: MegaSilver; Canticle_of_Deborah; sinkspur; Cicero; ninenot
This article contains some information that is wrong. The previous bishop, Bishop Cummins arranged it so he would have full control of the cathedral, even after he was no longer bishop. Bishop Allen Vigneron has no control over the cathedral project whatsoever. It's very unfortunate, but that is the current situation. I will try to update this with more information later, but please bump all the people on this thread to this, so there is no misunderstanding.
To: nickcarraway
Bishop Allen Vigneron has no control over the cathedral project whatsoever.That's contrary to Canon Law. Vigneron could simply overrule him, if he chose, and Cummins wouldn't have a leg to stand on.
68 posted on
05/08/2004 5:49:17 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
To: nickcarraway
The previous bishop, Bishop Cummins arranged it so he would have full control of the cathedral, even after he was no longer bishop. Bishop Allen Vigneron has no control over the cathedral project whatsoever.
Okay, how is this possible? If it is this way, there is a HUGE violation of canon law involved.
BTW, a lot of the Cathedrals were expensive to build (and are expensive to maintain). Ours wasn't cheap, but it was built with granite, marble, and stone. The mosiacs took 61 years to install. If it's done right, it's worth it. If it's not...
76 posted on
05/08/2004 7:17:50 PM PDT by
Desdemona
(Evil attacks good. Never forget.)
To: nickcarraway
Ah, that explains it. So I put the blame on the wrong bishop, then.
81 posted on
05/08/2004 7:40:34 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: nickcarraway
Wow, no control... how can that be I wonder? I know Bishop Vigneron inherited a oretty bad situation. But then he left Detroit after doing a lot for the seminary there.
94 posted on
05/09/2004 3:52:00 AM PDT by
Diva
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson