Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JasonC
I think you need to do some research before you presume to tell me what positions I am arguing for and against.

My involvement in this discussion started last November. Under keyword wheeledarmor you will find every thread and every post I have ever made on this subject.

Right now 4000 up armored humvees are immediately needed in Iraq is the argument on the other side of me, along with the assumptions underlying that assertion, not "Latest word from the field is that the armored hummers are not effective against the RPGs and bombs that are killing them. We need bradleys, tanks, strykers, and old apcs...The israelis sent the correct answer. Use real armor first". And "a wise commander wants some of everything: light, middle, heavy. There are different uses for each. The idea to streamline and go totally light and middle is unrealistic."

Last November M1114's were greatly coveted and OIF 1 had the same Bradleys, tanks and M113's they started with. Seems to me you have created a strawman.

64 posted on 05/09/2004 7:13:32 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Cannoneer No. 4
So do you agree with the propositions "We need bradleys, tanks, strykers, and old apcs...The israelis sent the correct answer. Use real armor first", or not?
69 posted on 05/09/2004 10:29:55 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson