Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Local corrections officer faces court martial for abusing Iraqi prisoners
Herald-Standard ^ | 05/04/2004 | Amy Karpinsky

Posted on 05/07/2004 11:01:21 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: lonevoice
If the jobs were Civil Service, promotions more than likely depended on taking a test. And tests aren't given that often. I started in Corrections in '80. In '84, I took the test for Sergeant and got a 92 on it. I wasn't reachable on the list until June of '89 and that was only because they had expanded the prisons because of overcrowding. So I had almost 10 years in the department before I even received my promotion. It wasn't because I'd had any disciplinary actions in my record. I had none. I was lucky that I made Sergeant at the facility I was at. In most cases, officers have to transfer across the state in order to go where the promotion is. That goes for Lieutenants, Captains, etc., as well. You have to go where the opening is. It isn't automatic that you will make promotion at your home facility. And, you might be away from home for years before an opening is available for you to come back. Transfers are based on seniority, so someone who had been promoted before you would end up on the list ahead of you.

I was pretty lucky during my 23 years. Other than having to move to Auburn, New York to take the job, I was able to stay right within the area that I wanted to be in for the rest of my career. I took the Lieutenant's test, but never wanted the position. I liked being a Sergeant, had a really good relationship with the officers, and felt I was more effective in that position. As a Lieutenant or above, you had to sell your soul to the state, and I wasn't willing to do that.

41 posted on 05/08/2004 8:17:03 AM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
Thanks for the info.
42 posted on 05/08/2004 12:35:45 PM PDT by lonevoice (Some things have to be believed to be seen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RebelTex
#2
43 posted on 05/09/2004 10:06:22 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Thanks for the ping.
44 posted on 05/09/2004 11:27:29 AM PDT by RebelTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RebelTex
Your welcome!
45 posted on 05/09/2004 11:38:18 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Article was written by a Karpinsky?!
46 posted on 05/09/2004 11:45:31 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson