Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UW study on warming draws fire: Claim lower atmosphere is heating up is in dispute
Spokesman Review ^ | 05/07/2004 | Sandi Doughton, Seattle Times

Posted on 05/07/2004 10:13:58 PM PDT by writer33

SEATTLE _ Scientists at the University of Washington say the lower atmosphere is heating up, a discovery that, if true, would overturn one of the main arguments against global warming.

But even before the results were published in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature, critics launched into a scholarly version of trash-talking, claiming the University of Washington group is flat wrong.

"It's going to be a very healthy scientific debate," predicted Mike Wallace, a UW climate-change expert who was not involved in the research. "It will take a while to sit down and look at these arguments dispassionately."

Qiang Fu, the lead scientist on the new analysis, said he expected controversy because the topic is central to the debate over climate change and the role of development and air pollution.

"This is a very important question," he said.

Ample evidence shows that temperatures at the planet's surface have risen more than one degree Fahrenheit over the past century, causing glaciers to melt and sea ice to thin.

But until now, studies of the Earth's lower atmosphere --the part where weather occurs -- have shown little or no temperature increase.

Global-warming skeptics say that suggests human activity is not changing the climate significantly.

Fu and his colleagues re-examined temperature data collected from weather satellites between 1979 and 2001.

The satellites measure temperature in both the lower and upper atmosphere.

While a human-caused global warming would be expected to raise the temperature in the lower atmosphere, computer models have shown it would have the opposite effect in the upper layer called the stratosphere. And indeed, temperatures there have been dropping steeply over the past several decades.

Because satellite measurements from the different layers overlap, Fu suspected the cooling in the stratosphere might be masking any temperature increase in the lower atmosphere.

Fu's team developed a statistical approach to subtract the stratosphere's influence and found the hunch was correct: Temperatures in the lower atmosphere rose about one-third degree per decade, slightly more than the increase seen at the planet's surface during the same time frame.

"I believe this shows the satellite temperatures can no longer be used as evidence to claim that global warming is not happening in the atmosphere," Fu said. "I think this could convince not just scientists but the public as well."

Some fellow scientists were not only unconvinced but dismissive of the study.

John Christy, director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama at Huntsville, has been analyzing the same satellite data since the early 1990s, finding no evidence of a significant temperature increase. He issued a rebuttal Thursday, saying the UW group went too far in subtracting the stratospheric cooling.

"The method they used creates a false warming signal," said Christy, who believes that humans are changing the climate, but that the changes are modest and not likely to cause ecological disaster.

"Most of the predictions are too alarmist," he said.

Fu deflected the criticism and predicted his team's new study will be the final answer to the long-standing puzzle about atmospheric warming.

"I'm confident this will not be an issue anymore," he said.

As an independent observer, Wallace said he thinks that Fu's approach seems reasonable, but that the debate won't be settled until all the scientists involved have time to hash out the data and the methods.

"I won't profess to claim the verdict is in yet," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: climataechange; climatechange

1 posted on 05/07/2004 10:13:58 PM PDT by writer33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: writer33
Okay, but even IF the temperature of the lower atmosphere is rising, how could this prove that it's not just Mother Nature doing whatever she feels like?

We've had ice ages, so it only stands to reason that we'd have "anti-ice" ages as well.
2 posted on 05/07/2004 10:40:43 PM PDT by SuperVillain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuperVillain
"We've had ice ages, so it only stands to reason that we'd have "anti-ice" ages as well."

12000 years ago this place where I sit had a mile thick ice cover. The average annual temperature here was obviously 32 Deg F, or less. It is now 52 Deg F. Clearly there is "global warming". It must be that Mother Nature anticipated I would buy an SUV and just started the SUV caused warming a little early.
3 posted on 05/08/2004 5:46:30 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
This has always been the root of my favorite question.

Where did the glacier go that extended into Kansas? When and why?

4 posted on 05/08/2004 5:53:06 AM PDT by steveyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: writer33
Cool. err, I mean warm.
What do I mean?
5 posted on 05/08/2004 6:21:00 AM PDT by pending
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
ping
6 posted on 05/08/2004 8:42:28 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson