Now then... the question becomes, "Shouldn't we require fingerprinting of all U.S. citizens, even if it only enables us to catch just ONE Islamikazi"?
"Shouldn't we ban firearms, if it saves the life of just one child?" What sort of tyranny are we beckoning in the future, by giving up our freedoms now, in the name of more easily corraling scum like this leftist lawyer?
This rodent may have gone on committing depradations if they hadn't had its fingerprints. But is that an argument for putting the tools of a totalitarian police state in the hands of the U.S. Government?
I don't have ready answers to these questions (though I am sure there are those on this forum who will be willing to weigh in, imperiously, with all sorts of divine proclamations). But I am sure of one thing: I, personally, am not willing to give up one tiny, microscopic little iota of freedom to this Government unless and until it FIRST - FIRST - FIRST fixes ITS little "Problem" with immigration, and political correctness, and closes the borders, and starts wholesale deportations of the rodents who have no right to be here. Until that time, anything this Government (all bow) asks ME to give up in the name of "Security" is pure, unadulterated hypocrisy. < < here imagine the sound of the bolt on an M14 being cycled... > >