[GummyIII]

Hi, Kim...just got home. Will peruse all this. Thanks for including me!!

[Freedom2specul8]

I am totally confused about all of this..I guess if one might have a team of 600 money hungry folks working for him/her, he could probably get anything he/she wants.

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include -

[Freedom2specul8]

You're welcome Gummy..

It's really annoying..and there has to be a copyright atty out there willing to help us figure all of this out, by telling us every single option we have.

In simple terms, there are demands news websites can make in court that will either be enforced or not enforced. They won't be able to win every single case,(or be able to have the law enforce or back up every single demand they make)....I don't care how rich the atty's are.