Replies

To you and the rest who are indignant as to comparing male and female circumcisions as unfair: you need to ask yourselves if there is an outcry of males and its representatives in Hollywood as far as the brutality, and the barbaric tradition of male circumcision of boys! The answer is no. Since there is no outcry on the male side, then it must be ok for a few days old boy to have some body cut a piece of his sensitive part of his anatomy - just for the heck of it. There has been a report in the American Journal of Medicine about the loss of pleasure the circumcised male suffers versus the uncircumcised men. But hay, Oprah said circumcising women is barbaric, and Oprah don't give a sh*t about males circumcised or not - perhaps she is a lesbo! If their balls fall off because of cancer, it does not matter to Oprah, and her activist feminists stupid audience. When did you see the buddy system encouraged for guys? Hey Bob, you want to examine my balls for lumps? Or have guys demonstrate on TV how to examine their balls! Of course NEVER! In the case of women, it is a different story, we even show their boobs on the tube, and encourage them to get together and feel each other breasts! Guys don't count. I am not supporting the barbarian Moslem circumsising little girls, and I don't support our culture either for doing an unneeded mutilation on the little infent boys. To you the suffering of the little boys don't count, only the suffering of the little girls. I am a better person - since I don't approve of suffering to both genders.