Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GQ: Powell Frustrated, Will Not Return
NewsMax ^ | May. 5, 2004 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 05/05/2004 11:24:24 AM PDT by Kaslin

GQ Magazine, in it's latest issue, details Sec. of State Colin Powell's frustration with the Bush administration, his battles with the Pentagon, his 'real' relationship with Vice President Dick Cheney, and whether he'll return for a second term.

The magazine issued a press release saying the following:

Secretary of State Colin Powell is exhausted, frustrated, and bitter, uncomfortable with President George W. Bush's agenda, and fatigued from his battles with the Pentagon, reports GQ magazine writer-at-large Wil S. Hylton in the June 2004 issue of GQ magazine. Hylton's exclusive article, "Casualty of War," in which he talks with Powell and his closest friends and colleagues openly and on the record, is available online at http://www.gq.com.

Highlights from the article include:

• Powell's chief of staff, Larry Wilkerson, on whether Powell will return for a second term: "He's tired. Mentally and physically. And if the president were to ask him to stay on -- if the president is re-elected and the president were to ask him to stay on, he might for a transitional period, but I don't think he'd want to do another four years."

• Powell's mentor from the National War College, Harlan Ullman on Powell's discomfort with the Bush team: "This is, in many ways, the most ideological administration Powell's ever had to work for. Not only is it very ideological, but they have a vision. And I think Powell is inherently uncomfortable with grand visions like that ... There's an ideological core to Bush, and I think it's hard for Powell to penetrate that."

• Ullman on Powell's relationship with Vice President Dick Cheney: "I can tell you firsthand that there is a tremendous barrier between Cheney and Powell, and there has been for a long time ... It's like McCain saying that his relations with the president are 'congenial,' meaning McCain doesn't tell the president to go f*ck himself every time."

• Ullman on National Security Advisor's Condoleeza Rice's comments that Powell and Cheney are "on more than speaking terms," and that they're "very friendly": "Condi's a jerk."

• Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage on Powell's presentation pre-war presentation before the U.N.: "It's a source of great distress for the secretary."

Rice insists that Powell had not been sent to the U.N. per se, because he was the only one who could have made the speech, and says: "There's really nobody else that can do it ... Everybody said it would have to be Colin ... We wanted to have enough of a profile. It was an important presentation. So we wanted to have enough profile."

Hylton reports that Rice described Powell as enthusiastic about the presentation, spending four days and nights at CIA headquarters and scouring the evidence against Saddam Hussein for ways to punch it up. She tells Hylton: "He wanted to be sure that we put in the best, strongest aerials we had, both from the point of view of the ones that were best documented but also the ones that were going to be punchiest."

But Armitage and Wilkerson describe Powell's four-day immersion at the CIA in very different terms -- not punching up the evidence but frantically scouring it for mistakes and faulty intelligence.

Armitage on Powell's preparation for his U.N. presentation: "Four days! And three nights! The secretary is a man of honor! He values being credible. To be credible, you have to be able to stand behind what you say. That's why he fieldstripped it."

Armitage refers to the process, common in Vietnam, of tearing up smoked cigarettes so they will decompose quickly and leave no trace for the enemy. "On the last day and night [at the CIA], the secretary called me, and he said, 'I need a little extra reinforcement.' So I went out there and spent Sunday and Saturday night with him. He needed someone. He was the voice throwing everything out, and he wanted another loud voice at the table."

Wilkerson describes those four days at the CIA as a battle, with Powell's team scrambling in the final hours to save the general from humiliation: "I was down at the agency as his task-force leader, and we fought tooth and nail with other members of the administration to scrub it and get the crap out."

Wilkerson on the neocons: "I make no bones about it. I have some reservations about people who have never been in the face of battle, so to speak, who are making cavalier decisions about sending men and women out to die.

"A person who comes immedately to mind in that regard is Richard Perle, who, thank God, tendered his resignation and no longer will be even a semioffcial person in this administration.

"Richard Perle's cavalier remarks about doing this or doing that with regard to military force always, always troubled me. Because it just showed me that he didn't have the appreciation, for example, that Colin Powell has for what it means ... I call them utopians ... I don't care whether utopians are Vladimir Lenin in a sealed train going to Moscow or Paul Wolfowitz.

"Utopians, I don't like. You're never going to bring utopia, and you're going to hurt a lot of people in the process of trying to do it."

Wilkerson on using sanctions against Cuba: "Dumbest policy on the face of the earth. It's crazy."

Wil S. Hylton's article, "Casualty of War," is available online at http://www.gq.com, and will be available on newsstands in New York and Los Angeles on May 18, and nationwide on May 25. GQ is the leading men's general-interest magazine and part of Conde Nast Publications, Inc.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: foggybottom; gq; knownothing; powell; ridiculous; secondguessing; speculating
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Kaslin
His mouth to God's ears. Colin Powell has been an absolutely absymal secretary of state - just ask the US women citizens still being held prisoner (some in forced marriages) in Saudi Arabia. Just ask the people of Lewiston, ME, buried under an avalanche of Bantu "refugees" because the State Department doesn't think we have enough. They never met an Arab jihadi they didn't like, either. Good riddance to Powell, and maybe President Bush in his second term will put someone in charge of State who has some cojones - like Coni Rice.
21 posted on 05/05/2004 11:56:12 AM PDT by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
What a shocker -- don't most 2-term Presidents have a lot of turnover early in their second term? This is kind of like predicting that the sun will rise in the east tomorrow.

They sure do, but the left acts like Presdident Bhush is the only one who has a turnover. I would not be surprised if most in the administration will be staying with him

22 posted on 05/05/2004 11:57:41 AM PDT by Kaslin (N.O.B.B.F.P!!! No one but Bush for president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The most quoted person is "Ullman," a "mentor" of Powell's presumably from years ago.

Load of hogwash. Every time I see Powell on TV he is nothing but supportive of Bush.

23 posted on 05/05/2004 11:58:20 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Powell wants the three piece suit to return...
24 posted on 05/05/2004 12:01:32 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Next time clean glasses

Presdident Bhush =President Bush

25 posted on 05/05/2004 12:03:04 PM PDT by Kaslin (N.O.B.B.F.P!!! No one but Bush for president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew
What Black person would any white conservative vote for as President of the US?
26 posted on 05/05/2004 12:07:14 PM PDT by Truth Barer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
Note the obligatory swipe at the 'utopian neoconservatives' from a State Department still living in the 1970s world of detente and accomodation.
27 posted on 05/05/2004 12:07:52 PM PDT by Belisaurius ("Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, Ted" - Joseph Kennedy 1958)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: far sider
Who? Condi Rice, Bill Frist, John Ashcroft, Rudy Giuliani - anybody but Powell. RINO.
28 posted on 05/05/2004 12:11:47 PM PDT by vandykelastone (I'm so glad Goober Pyle is the Governor of New Mexico, aren't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Truth Barer
Ummm, ant qualified one? Get a grip.
29 posted on 05/05/2004 12:13:57 PM PDT by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cspackler
ant = any...
30 posted on 05/05/2004 12:14:13 PM PDT by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
The liberals love to try to divide the top tier of leadership, so invent all kinds of innuendo, creating conspiracies out of things that were never actually said.

They did this from the very beginning with Powell. Too bad so many conservatives believe it too.

31 posted on 05/05/2004 12:14:57 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Truth Barer
What Black person would any white conservative vote for as President of the US?

Condi Rice and Alan Keyes are two that I can think of off the top of my head - given a little time I probably couln't come up with any more than a dozen additional examples...

32 posted on 05/05/2004 12:16:21 PM PDT by jscd3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Truth Barer
What Black person would any white conservative vote for as President of the US?

26 posted on 05/05/2004 12:07:14 PM PDT by Truth Barer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




Perferably one that has the balls to do his own complaining instead of sending out a mouthpiece to do it for him.

AND one that doesn't use the national stage to promote PREFERENCES and AA for minorities.

Yeah there ya go.

Now you can continue your open water trolling!
33 posted on 05/05/2004 12:16:31 PM PDT by Area51 (RINO Hunter, Big Time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Truth Barer
The first black President of the US will be a Republican, not a Rat.

Bet on it.


No, Clinton doesn't count.
34 posted on 05/05/2004 12:22:48 PM PDT by motzman (Kerry's Haircut: Operation Shear Shrek)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Truth Barer
What Black person would any white conservative vote for as President of the US?

Your first ever post on Free Republic, and you spout a racist crack in the form of a question.

Better turn the A/C on, it's going to get warm where you are.

35 posted on 05/05/2004 12:24:15 PM PDT by FreedomFarmer (In memory of FReeper Harpseal. Yorktown.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Thud
I See another anti-Bush book coming.
36 posted on 05/05/2004 12:24:38 PM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
Not really.

There is no RULE to prevent it. It's just an "unwritten" agreement that no member of the "permanent council" - 5 nations - will not serve as Secretary General.

Since we are a permanent member, that should preclude Clinton from being able to be elected there - but I believe the "PLAN" has always been to have Bill at the UN and Hillary at the USA - thereby ruling the world. I'm not making this up - really.

However, if anybody was paying attention, Clinton was lobbying for this job during the run-up to the war. I suspect he knew that if Bush went to war - the oil-for-food was going to be exposed and Kofi would be in trouble. But .. if I read the clinton-lovers correctly - they weren't buying his ascension to the UN throne.
37 posted on 05/05/2004 12:24:55 PM PDT by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This is recycled from Woodward's book it sounds like.

Powell already spoke powerfully and forcefully refuting the business that he's unhappy, not friends with Cheney and at odds with administration policies.
38 posted on 05/05/2004 12:31:45 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
I noticed the same thing. A rather misleading article and title, no doubt to sell product.
39 posted on 05/05/2004 12:41:37 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
GQ? Gentleman's Quarterly?? I'm holding out to hear about this, and about other weighty geopolitical matters, from the TRUE voice of sanity in international affairs: InternationalMale.com, of course.
40 posted on 05/05/2004 12:50:33 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson