[orionblamblam]

You make no sense. The incorrect point was raised that "everytrhing has a purpose," when clearly not everything does, thus refuting part of Creationism; in I pointed out than extraneous things *TEND* to be bred out of existence. You do know what "tend to" means, do you not?

In evolution, the tendency is to breed out the useless, but tendency does not equate to perfection. But if God did it... imperfection means an imperfect creation and thus an imperfect God. So are you argueing against God?

> See any resemblance?
What, between pictures of Darwin and a red X?

[K1avg]

I pointed out than extraneous things *TEND* to be bred out of existence.

Yes. If I read your post correctly, you said that the "imperfect" traits were either bred out OR killed the "host." In light of this, the self-contradiction is even more embarrassing.

You do know what "tend to" means, do you not?

It's garbage like this that makes no one take you seriously. We can have an intelligent debate, or we can throw mud at each other. Your choice.

But if God did it... imperfection means an imperfect creation and thus an imperfect God

Horrendous non sequiter. If we had been created perfect, then WE would BE God, correct? The simple fact that we are imperfect validates the existence of a superior being, does it not?

What, between pictures of Darwin and a red X?

It's a picture of this loser:
But a red "X" works just as well.

Anxiously awaiting your reply...

[happydogdesign]

As Trollia Creationatis evolved, it found a digital niche in which it baits the logical and sensible, and derives sustenance from the pixels hurled its way.