Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bondserv
For your information, as I predicted 2 years ago, there will continue to be a groundswell of scientists who begin to dispute Macro-Evolution using real scientific method. Scientists are becoming disillusioned having to dance around like politicians.

Just 2 years ago? You're way late.

Meanwhile the number of biological or geological scientists called Steve who endorse evolution draws further and further ahead of the number of loosely defined 'scientists' who reject it.

262 posted on 05/06/2004 10:10:16 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]


To: Right Wing Professor
Meanwhile the number of biological or geological scientists called Steve who endorse evolution draws further and further ahead of the number of loosely defined 'scientists' who reject it.

With a stable of ten's of thousands that is documentation of the failing support.

Just 2 years ago? You're way late.

Look at the signs, FR has more and more post's where evolution is being refuted by reputable modern scientists. Choose to ignore the change in momentum if you like. The momentum is being stimulated by a lack of support in the recent genetic blueprinting, so spare us the, "momentum is not an indicator of truth" bit.

P.S. Long time no Freep.

264 posted on 05/06/2004 10:24:31 PM PDT by bondserv (Alignment is critical!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson