[PatrickHenry]

When it comes to macro-evolution, its more like astrology than geometry.

Okay. You're one of those who grudgingly (I assume) admit the existence of what you call micro-evolution (which is, after all, nothing less than evolution), but you draw a magic line -- somewhere, somehow -- when it progresses to what you call macro evolution. Fine. As long as you're happy.

[microgood]

Okay. You're one of those who grudgingly (I assume) admit the existence of what you call micro-evolution (which is, after all, nothing less than evolution), but you draw a magic line -- somewhere, somehow -- when it progresses to what you call macro evolution. Fine. As long as you're happy.

I do not grudgingly agree with microevolution, since it is observable. Macroevolution is not observable. To me it is the nature of the evidence, not just believing what I want to believe. I know physics works because I can watch the space shuttle take off.

Micro-evolution is a fact that is plainly observable throughout nature. Macro-evolution is a theory that has never been observed in science.