Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ovrtaxt
Jefferson was always for a limited federal government, and his actions showed that as much as his words.
Foreign affairs was mostly what the federal government was invented to do though.

I don't think of 'neocons' as especial proponents of the liberal interpretation of the "general welfare" clause. That sounds more like a "moderate", or "maverick" or any other media synonym for "liberal".

'Neocons' accept what has been accepted by the populace in the use of the liberal "general welfare" clause, isn't that right? That's pragmatic, no one can take the 'free' government goodies voters are used to away from them- absent a miracle.

70 posted on 05/11/2004 6:03:45 PM PDT by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
'Neocons' accept what has been accepted by the populace in the use of the liberal "general welfare" clause, isn't that right? That's pragmatic, no one can take the 'free' government goodies voters are used to away from them- absent a miracle.

Well at least you admit it. You're not a conservative. You're a FDR populist. 'Well it's there, no use in trying to stop it. Hey we'll make sure the next big thing (healthcare) isn't as big as it possibly could be. That's sort of conservative isn't it?'

72 posted on 05/11/2004 8:11:33 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson