To: Mia T
Why do you link WND? and an article that has not a single mention of Gorelick?
Do you make a habit of deception and html abuse?
To: antaresequity
Why do you link WND? and an article that has not a single mention of Gorelick?CLINTON TREASON = none dare call it treason
See, antaresequity? It was overtly hidden all the time. ;^)
16 posted on
05/05/2004 4:51:21 PM PDT by
jla
(http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com)
To: antaresequity
The WND treason article, which provides support for my gorelick thesis, is the new addition to my series, and is, thus, linked in the header.
If this thread were solely about the WND article, I would have posted the entire article. It is the conclusion of the article that most interests me, i.e., that the clintons, seditious and self-serving, auctioned off our national security, sovereignty and economy to the highest bidder.
Sorry the point of my post eluded you.
17 posted on
05/05/2004 5:05:10 PM PDT by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson