[churchillbuff]

bump

[satchmodog9]

Although I question the motive of the author, I can honestly say that there are many valid points here.

[churchillbuff]

ping

[Howlin]

Kwiatkowski?

FGS, you're pathetic.

Don't ever ping me to this claptrap again.

[CWOJackson]

LOL! You must really be getting desperate when you have to drag out the patsy drama queen.

[CWOJackson]

According to the May 2003 American Military University Student News Letter, Professor Karen Kwiatkowski presented "her paper entitled Information Technology and the New African Entrepreneur at the annual African Studies Association conference on 6 December 2002 in Washington DC. Professor Kwiatkowski is also developing courses on African Political Economy and Global Immigration for APUS."cache file.

Your guest Bush-basher has an interesting background.

[DugwayDuke]

I'm quite curious as to why a person with your obvious admiration for Churchill would consider Lew Rockwell's site as a credible source. Have you read any of the Churchill articles found at that site? You can use their search engine found at the bottom of their home page. I think you might be surprised. Here's one of a series of articles:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/raico-churchill1.html

This is part one of a five part series that: "A definitive debunking of the Churchill myth in five parts , by our greatest historian of liberty, from The Costs of War"

[Leisler]

"American soldiers today are quite familiar with the military industrial complex and outsourcing. They see inedible food, an extra burden of providing security, and shocking pay inequities. They see inscrutable accountability mysteries. "

Are you ignorant, stupid or disingenuous, or all three? We have had military contractors and the complaints of her topic sentence since the Revolution, and every war since then. Her, and your, first stated premise, that "today" these private contractors are new, and unique is patently false. Take this crap to DU. Try posting something informative.