Only when the source is a credible reporter speaking the obvious nationally. I don’t care if you don’t recognize the obvious. The rest of the world moves on without you.
Only when the source is a credible reporter speaking the obvious nationally. I don’t care if you don’t recognize the obvious. The rest of the world moves on without you.
(MY bold -- your word)
Your logic is circular. You claim that what an unnamed source is true because it's obvious. Yet what is so-call "obvious" by you is really just a week or tens worth of unnamed sources that, repeated often enough, becomes fact.
Objectivity, moves on without -- you.