Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oregon prisoners get flat-screen TVs
CNN.com via Drudge ^ | May 3, 2004 | CNN

Posted on 05/03/2004 11:49:41 AM PDT by 68skylark

SALEM, Oregon (AP) -- Convicted felon Nicholas Krahmer kicks back on a bunk and enjoys one of the latest perks of prison life: A spanking new flat-screen TV that's still the envy of many viewers on the outside.

The tiny 7-inch set resembles flat-screen models installed in cars or on airplane seats. But it beats the alternative, he says -- a night in the recreation room with about 150 other inmates who are prone to brawls over what to watch and where to sit.

Oregon's in-cell television policy springs from years of frustration in finding incentives for good behavior among prisoners serving mandatory sentences.

Krahmer bought the $300 television with money he earned working in prison, where he is paid a few dollars a day for computer drafting. Inmates also must have clean discipline records to qualify for the flat-screens.

"I've worked for it. I've stayed clear of any sort of nonsense in the institution," said Krahmer, 27, who is serving 70 months at Oregon State Correctional Institution, outside Salem, for assault with a knife.

"I've never seen an episode of 'Survivor.' I'm eager to watch that. I want to see what my family watches."

Randy Geer, administrator of the prisons' non-cash incentive programs, said that as far as he knows, Oregon is the only state where felons have flat-screen TVs in their cells. The 25 inmates who have bought the high-tech TVs get the same basic cable that's piped into the prison's common TV room.

Before the flat-screen program began in Krahmer's prison last month, Oregon was already one of 16 states in the country to allow in-cell televisions.

But most inmates in the state's 12 medium and maximum security prisons did not benefit: Only one of those prisons allowed personal TVs, and they were of the traditional tube variety, not flat-screens.

Practical gadget While allowing inmates to enjoy the latest high-tech gadgetry may seem odd, prison officials stress the flat-screens -- which the state plans to introduce soon in all 12 of its higher security prisons -- were selected for practical reasons.

Bulky tube televisions pose dangers, such as parts that could be used as a weapon, and hollow spaces that could serve as a hiding place for contraband, Geer said.

Flat-screen TVs used at the Oregon prison are made of clear plastic -- so inmates cannot hide contraband inside.

Managers also considered cramped prison cells and decided the sleek, flat-screen models made sense.

"It was really the best solution," Geer said. "It is not a luxury item."

Before implementing the policy, Oregon officials questioned prison directors about television policy in all 50 states. Some states have decided to prohibit TVs in cells because the traditional tube models are too bulky. If a prisoner is sent to disciplinary confinement, the prison must store his or her belongings.

"Try finding space for 1,000 13-inch televisions," Geer said.

Opposing view Steve Doell, president of the Oregon chapter of Crime Victims United, opposes television in prison for anything other than educational programming and to ease the work of correctional staff in disciplining inmates.

"If I were in charge, I would make sure they watch the Learning Channel, Discovery and C-Span," he said. "There's lots of movies and entertainment that show violence and sexual behavior."

Rank and file officers, however, are nearly as happy as the inmates.

"It's cut down on the number of inmates that come out in the evening to watch TV," said Julian Ruiz, a corrections officer who operates electronic door locks and monitors a cell block. "The more people you get down here in the evening, the more problems."

In the common TV room, each cell with two inmates is given a night to choose what to watch, and the honor rotates in strict order, Ruiz said. Prison staff intercede only to ensure major television events are shown, such as the Super Bowl, the NCAA basketball championships and the World Series. There is little interest in presidential addresses or other news, Ruiz said.

"If you ask, 'who wants to watch Bill Moyers?' one hand goes up, maybe. You ask about football, 100 hands go up," he said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
"I've worked for it," said Krahmer, 27, who is serving 70 months at Oregon State Correctional Institution, outside Salem, for assault with a knife.

I'm glad to see he's doing well in his self-esteem classes.

1 posted on 05/03/2004 11:49:41 AM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
"It was really the best solution," Geer said. "It is not a luxury item."

Hmmm....OK.

"Try finding space for 1,000 13-inch televisions," Geer said.

How about NO TV? Naw, that would be cruel and unusual and likely violate someones constitutional guarantee to watch provocative shows like CSI (continuing education credits for prison inmates)and the Victoria's Secret specials (wouldn't want violent criminals to go without their daily allotment of sexual consumption.)

Whatever happened to HARD labor?

2 posted on 05/03/2004 11:55:58 AM PDT by Damocles (sword of...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Krahmer bought the $300 television with money he earned working in prison, where he is paid a few dollars a day for computer drafting. Inmates also must have clean discipline records to qualify for the flat-screens.

Shrug. Doesn't seem that bad to me. They have to buy the screens themselves, and have to behave well to get (and, presumably, keep) them. If it prevents brawls and promotes good behavior, and doesn't cost the taxpayer, what's the problem?

3 posted on 05/03/2004 11:56:20 AM PDT by johnfrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
"If you ask, 'who wants to watch Bill Moyers?' one hand goes up, maybe. You ask about football, 100 hands go up," he said.

It would be interesting to see the difference who wants to watch Bill Moyers, and say, "Who would like to set their head ablaze?"

4 posted on 05/03/2004 11:57:57 AM PDT by glock rocks (Please pray for our patriot armed forces in harm's way - and the families awaiting their safe return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
I admit it sounds silly, but if you look at a few things, such as the fact that...

1) He worked and earned the money to pay for it himself Krahmer bought the $300 television with money he earned working in prison)

2) Behavior is taken into account (Inmates also must have clean discipline records to qualify for the flat-screens.)

3) The guards and officers like it and it cuts down on discipline problems (Rank and file officers, however, are nearly as happy as the inmates. "It's cut down on the number of inmates that come out in the evening to watch TV," said Julian Ruiz, a corrections officer who operates electronic door locks and monitors a cell block. "The more people you get down here in the evening, the more problems.")

It doesn't seem to be a bad idea.

5 posted on 05/03/2004 11:58:46 AM PDT by TheBigB ("Any moment now, unspeakable horror! Trust me!" -Tom Servo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
If I were in charge, I would make sure they watch ... C-Span

Oh yeah, we're going to expose convicted criminals to --- criminals! They only thing they'll learn is how to steal legally.

6 posted on 05/03/2004 12:00:33 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
"If you ask, 'who wants to watch Bill Moyers?' one hand goes up, maybe.

Put your hand down, Mr. Hussein.

7 posted on 05/03/2004 12:01:50 PM PDT by Libertarian444
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
3) The guards and officers like it and it cuts down on discipline problems

Many LEOs say movies and programs with violence, sex, etc create more discipline problems. It's like young kids watching the Ninja Turtles - when the cartoon is over, they try all the new moves they just learned.

Side note, when the local boys did have television privleges, their favorite show was COPS - they critiqued the officers conduct. Go figure.

8 posted on 05/03/2004 12:04:23 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
I'd restrict the channels available, certainly.
9 posted on 05/03/2004 12:08:55 PM PDT by TheBigB ("Any moment now, unspeakable horror! Trust me!" -Tom Servo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Oregon's in-cell television policy springs from years of frustration in finding incentives for good behavior among prisoners serving mandatory sentences.

Hmmm, I guess no one thought of disincentives for bad behavior. Why not withhold meals for infractions? Recalcitrant prisoners would quickly become too weak to cause much trouble.

10 posted on 05/03/2004 12:13:49 PM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
To just Lifetime?
11 posted on 05/03/2004 12:14:55 PM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SupplySider
Ooh! Even better--more broccoli and brussel sprouts! With breakfast, lunch and dinner.
12 posted on 05/03/2004 12:17:21 PM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
"If you ask, 'who wants to watch Bill Moyers?' one hand goes up, maybe. You ask about football, 100 hands go up," he said.

I'll add that to the short list of questions which both freepers and convicted felons will give the same answer. Another is "Who's desperate enough for a conjugal visit with Old Crusty?"

13 posted on 05/03/2004 12:18:56 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Clinton, advised by Dick Clarke, did nothing. - Ann Coulter 4/1/04, How 9-11 Happened)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
to see the difference who wants to watch Bill Moyers, and say, "Who would like to set their head ablaze?"

I'll take the lighter fluid treatment, please.... I can't stand Moyers.

/john

14 posted on 05/03/2004 12:19:03 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Soy el jefe de la cocina. No discuta con mí.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
One one hand I think it's a good idea....on the other hand I think....sheesh...if you don't have to pay rent, food, electric, et. al. then it's a lot easier to save up for a flat screen TV. ;)
15 posted on 05/03/2004 12:20:56 PM PDT by BossLady (What do your choices cost you????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
Ooh! Even better--more broccoli and brussel sprouts! With breakfast, lunch and dinner.

Have some compassion for the guards :-))

16 posted on 05/03/2004 12:21:48 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
No, don't wanna drive the suicide rate up. :)
17 posted on 05/03/2004 12:23:41 PM PDT by TheBigB ("Any moment now, unspeakable horror! Trust me!" -Tom Servo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
You may be on to something. The civil liberties crowd would be all over starvation, even the voluntary kind. But could they argue with horrible but nutritious food for punishment? Slug-cornmeal-dandelion green soup should be cheap and hit all the minimum daily requirements.
18 posted on 05/03/2004 12:24:49 PM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BossLady
Well yeah, but remember this is a 7" screen. It's not like some thousand-buck 50-inch set.

As long as we don't have to pay for it, and it keeps the prisoners in line (thus helping ensure the saftey of the guards), I see no problem.

19 posted on 05/03/2004 12:25:28 PM PDT by TheBigB ("Any moment now, unspeakable horror! Trust me!" -Tom Servo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
This may become a cause of recitivism.
20 posted on 05/03/2004 12:25:43 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson