Others, with Jewish, Christian and patriotic themes, may be found at this site:
Here's a great text about Islam
TOPICAL QUOTATIONS
MUHAMMADS OWN WORDS
Prophet of Doom was written to expose what Islams founder had to say about himself, his ambition, religion,
and god. Here are some examples of what Muhammad had to say about:
I. Fighting ° Terrorism ° War ° Jihad ° Martyrs/Mercenaries ° Muslim Militants
II. Murder ° Torture ° Thievery & Slavery ° Peace, Islam Style ° Peaceful Muslims ° No Freedom, No Choice ° Deception ° Intolerance
III. Eye Witnesses ° Megalomania ° Inspiration ° Allah, Islam's Ilah ° Ar Rahman
IV. Demons & Devils ° Predestination ° Muhammand's Morality ° Love of Money ° Lust ° Muhammad's Paradise ° Allah's Hell ° Jews
V. Christians ° Racism ° Women in Islam ° Stupidity ° Islamic Science ° Allah's Astronomy
Prophet of Doom provides a comprehensive, contextual, and chronological review of the Islamic scriptures starting with the religions rendition of creation and ending with the terror it inspired. The book brings Islams five earliest and most trusted sources together, putting their words and deeds into the context of time and place to expose what the dogmas founder had to say about himself, his ambition, religion, and god. There is no better way to understand Muhammad, Allah, or Islamor to evaluate their legacy.
When reviewing the primary papers of any dogma we must be mindful that context comes in three forms. There is the context of historical chronologythat of circumstance, place, people, and time. There is the context of adjacency the proximity of related words and thoughts within the writings themselves. And context can be topical; in this case similar themes can be brought together and organized by subject. All forms of context provide clarity.
Unfortunately, the Quran fails its faithful on all three counts. The book lacks any semblance of chronology. It is deficient when it comes to providing the required context of place, people, and time. Adjacent verses are usually unrelated and often contradictory. In the Meccan surahs there is a preoccupation with railing against Muhammads mockers and with describing Allahs torments, but the rejections and condemnations are strewn haphazardly through the text. This is also true of the Medina surahs and their fixation on submit and obey, perform and pay, fight or burn. Yes these are themes, and they are repetitive, but they are not presented in cohesive groupings.
The Qurans failures in this regard dictate Prophet of Dooms length, order, and format. The narrative and chronological Hadith compiled by Ishaq and Tabari were required to provide the Quran with the context of circumstance, time, and place that it otherwise lacked. Bukharis and Muslims topical Hadith were used to amplify important Islamic themes. Therefore, Muhammads message has never been as clear as it is in these pages. Unfortunately for humankind, unmasked, his message is repulsive, even terrorizing. But that is precisely what makes this study important.
The Muhammads Own Words appendix isnt the best way to learn about Muhammad or to understand his Quran. But its topical structure may be the most effective means to evaluate his religion. This format facilitates the study of important issues from various perspectives. Their relative significance can be evaluated based upon the volume of material relegated to them. So for your edification and convenience, this appendix collates nearly 3,000 quotes from the Quran, Sira, Tarikh, and Hadith under subject headings like Fighting, War, Jihad, Murder, Thievery, and Intolerance. In contrast to the book, Muhammads Own Words ends with Islamic creation and begins by focusing on the tools of tyranny and terror. They represent the dogmas least understood and most lethal pronouncements. I trust you'll find this endeavor as sobering as it is enlightening.
Every passage in this appendix is recorded in one of Islams prime sources: the Sira (biography), Tarikh (history), Hadith (report), or Quran (recital). They are all documented. Each quote fell from Muhammads lips, no matter how it was inspired. Every recital, whether surah or hadith was passed along to us by the same group of men and by the same meanshearsay. As you will discover, the message does not differ from source to source because the author was always the same.
Ishaqs Sirat Rasul Allah, provides the sole account of Muhammads life and the formation of Islam written within 200 years of the prophets death. It is a Hadith collection, comprised of oral reports from Muhammad and his companions. There is no earlier or more accurate source. While the character, message, and deeds portrayed within its pages are the antithesis of Christs and his disciples, the Siras chronological presentation is as indispensable to Muslims as are the Gospels to Christians. The Quran cant be understood or followed without it.
The Tarikh is the oldest, most trusted, and comprehensive history of Islams formation and Muhammads example, called Sunnah. It was compiled by Tabari. His History of al-Tabari is formatted like the Bible. It begins with Islamic creation and ends with the acts of Muhammads companions. Tabari also composed Islams most revered Tafir, or commentary, on the Quran. He was the dogmas first scholar. His history serves to explain Allahs Recital and Muhammads Sunnah by way of his compilations Hadith.
The most revered topical collections of early Islamic Traditions were compiled by Bukhari and Muslim. They, like this appendix, assort Hadith under important Islamic themes, such as Jihad, Islamic Raids, Knowledge, Creation, Fear, Taxes, Money, Witnesses, Punishment, and Predestination.
To confirm the validity and nature of the Islamic scriptures quoted herein, read what Muslim scholars wrote in the preface of the Hadith and Quran: Bukhari is a Collection of sayings and deeds of Prophet Muhammad, also known as the Sunnah. The reports of the Prophets sayings and deeds are called Hadith. Bukhari lived a couple of centuries after the Prophets death and collected his Hadith. Each report was checked for compatibility with the Quran, and the veracity of the chain of reporters had to be established. The Quran is one leg of two which form the basis of Islam. The second is the Sunnah of the Prophet. What makes the Quran different from the Sunnah is its form. The Quran is quite literally the Word of Allah, whereas the Sunnah [which is comprised of Hadith] was inspired by Allah but the wording and actions are the Prophets.
When quoting from the Quran and Hadith, I have elected to use a blended translation. No language transfers perfectlyone word to another. Five of my twelve translations of the Quran were combined to create the most accurate conveyance of the message possible. For clarity and readability, I have trimmed unruly word patterns and meaningless repetitions, being careful not to alter the meaning or message of any passage. Insertions within parenthesis (like this) were added by the Arabic translators to fill in missing words or to clarify the text. Insertions within brackets [like this] represent my observations.
There are many reasons Islamic clerics are sensitive about having the Quran translated into a contemporary language. The most important are that they dont want anyone to know what it actually says or how poorly its written, but well get to that in a moment. Muslims claim that Arabic was Allahs original tongue and that translations are simply paraphrases. But that would make Allah younger than man because Arabic is one of mans most recent dialects. Its written form didnt emerge until the 7th century. And most every important religious word, concept, and name used in the Quran was derived from Syriac, the language of Syrian Christians in the 6th century.
Muslims invest a quarter of their school day learning to recite the Quran not reading it or understanding it. They simply learn to mouth its sounds in the arcane, inadequate, and odd dialect of Religious Arabic. That way they can be fooled into believing that its Gods Book, and that its written intelligently. Ignorant, they can be indoctrinated and thus manipulated by clerics and kings. Even turned into human bombs when it serves Islams interests.
If Muslims were to shed their yoke of ignorance, they would discover that the real reason those who indoctrinate them, control them, suppress them, fleece them, and abuse them want them deceived is that the actual message contained in Allahs Book is horrendous. It is more intolerant, racist, punitive, and violent than Hitlers Mein Kampf. There are one hundred vicious verses for every nice one. The book inspires infinitely more terror than peace.
They would also discover that the Quran is poorly written. There are countless meaningless words, foreign words, and missing words which is why translations differ so significantlyeveryone is guessing as to what Muhammad thought Allah was trying to say. This is why Gerd Puin, the worlds leading specialist in Arabic calligraphy and Quranic paleography, studying the oldest manuscripts, speaks with disdain about the willingness of Muslims and non-Muslims alike, to accept Islamic dogma. He says: The Quran claims for itself that it is mubeen, or clear, but if you just look at it, you will see that every fifth sentence or so simply doesnt make sense. Many Muslims will tell you otherwise, but the fact is that a fifth of the Quran is just incomprehensible. This is what has caused the traditional anxiety regarding translation. If the Quran is not comprehensible, if it cant even be understood in Arabic, then its not translatable into any language. That is why Muslims are afraid.
By reading the Quran in a language they actually understand, Muslims would find that there is no semblance of order in the central book of Islam either. The Quran is a jumbled mess without context, chronology, or rational transitions. It is only by rearranging the Quran in the order it was revealed and infusing it with the context of the chronological Hadith narratives, that the book begins to make sense. But by so doing, it becomes obvious that the Quran was simply a reflection of Muhammads demented character and of his misplaced ambition. The more you know, the more you will come to despise the fraud Muhammad perpetrated on his fellow Arabs and they on human kind. To know the Quran is to reject Islam.
The documented references in Muhammads Own Words were derived from English translations of ancient Islamic manuscripts. The Sirat Rasul Allah by Ibn Ishaq, circa 750 A.D., was edited and abridged by Ibn Hisham in 830 and translated by Alfred Guillaume under the title, The Life of Muhammad in 1955 by Oxford Press. The History of al-Tabari was written by Muhammad bin al-Tabari between 870 and 920 A.D. His work was translated and published in 1987-97 by S.U.N.Y. Press. I quote from volumes I, II, VI, VII, VIII, and IX. Al-Bukharis Hadith, titled: Sahih Al-BukhariThe True Traditions was collected by Imam Bukhari in 850 A.D. I have used the collectors original nomenclature. The following Quran translations were blended and amplified: Ahmed Ali, Pikthal, Noble by Muhsin Khan, Yusuf Ali, and Shakir.
This appendix is not designed to replace the book. It is an aid for those who have read the book. Every quotation is presented chronologically in Prophet of Doom within the context of Muhammads life. They are reviewed in juxtaposition to their adjacent passages. Finding the page upon which a Hadith from Ishaq or Tabari is covered is thus relatively simple since their authors observed a strict chronology. The higher the page number or volume, the later youll find the reference in Prophet of Doom. But the Quran isnt as logical. So if you want to review its surahs within the context of chronology, place, circumstance, and adjacency, youll have to use the Index and turn to the chapter in which the specific surah is presented.
Some of these quotes have been abridged so that non-topical material doesn't clutter the subject. Most of my explanatory comments have been removed and thus I strongly encourage you to read Prophet of Doom prior to using the appendix.
When the Muslims in India got their Muslim homeland of Pakistan, they did not stop attacking India, in fact they expanded their realm of meddling and murder of innocent 'infidels'. In their work of sacrificing this innocent blood to their god, they have accepted the practice of sacrificing their own children in order to get more death for their god. Radical Islam is an insane death cult, and "moderate" Islam is its Trojan Horse in the West. |