[FairOpinion]

Yawn.

Stupid, but I think they are beating this story to death.

Why isn't it front page news that Muslim terrorists poisoned little 8 year old girls in Afghanistan, because they object to little girls going to school?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1128319/posts

I think that's a much bigger story than embarrassing some terrorists, with even their faces not being shown.

Frankly I couldn't care less, what anyone would do to the terrorists, because whatever they would do, isn't enough.

[sauropod]

Y'know, it isn't often I agree w/ you but this time I do.

[New Perspective]

Why isn't it front page news that Muslim terrorists poisoned little 8 year old girls in Afghanistan, because they object to little girls going to school?

I will give you 2 choices.

A)The media in our free world can cover a story which is covered under the first amendment.

B)Mention this to someone in the press in front of a terrorist, and you will have your head removed from your body.

Now in which country are you going to make a stink in?? I think we know the answer already.

[MEG33]

It's what separates us from the terrorists,sadistic Saddamites and those who would poison little girls to keep them from school.There are always going matters of police brutality and tempers exploding over one's dead comrades.If one is trying to save lives,psychological stress is warranted.Physical torture is not allowed .

It is hopefully kept to a minimum.Strip searching is not abuse.It is a life saver.It is odd that the Brit pictures don't seem authentic to the area they were taken or the uniform,etc. is questioned.