Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG
Occupation force.
360 posted on 05/03/2004 2:51:48 PM PDT by zarf (..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies ]


To: zarf
ah, 500,000 occupation force is one possible approach.
call it #1.

The other was to has a smaller force and use lots of proxies. That was the DoD plan, ie, let the peshmerga and some of former army help us. That is what we did in Afghanistan. call it #2.

The third approach is to have a force that reflects #2, but then to disband the militias and armies that could make it work, with lack of Iraqi security force and int'l help. ooops, that's what we did, giving us worst of #2 and #1. we've now gotten some unfriendly militias filling in the vacuum created.

I dont think a heavy ocupation force was the right approach at all, but I understand that we need more security forces that are reliable 'in-country'.
363 posted on 05/03/2004 4:17:26 PM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - I salute our brave fallen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson