To: joanie-f
"1) individual liberty is not compromisable
(2) along with liberty, the sanctity of life is not compromisable
And, in order to protect and ensure the above:
(3) American law and justice cannot be over-ridden by international law or treaties
(4) American sovereignty must be preserved from outside interference of any kind
(5) the expressly limited to a few enumerated powers authority of government must remain in the hands of the people"
==
Good list.
But, as you said, the primary is over.
Now it's time to focus on the November elections and ask yourself, whether a Democrat or Republican Senate fits in with your criteria.
If conservatives stay home "to teach Specter a lesson", we may well have a Democrat Senate with President Kerry.
11 posted on
05/01/2004 5:20:34 PM PDT by
FairOpinion
(If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
To: FairOpinion
blah blah, blah blah blah, we must hold hands and do what our.Republican.bosses.tell.us.to.do., blah blah, blah.
Were you Charlie Brown's teacher, by any chance?
To: FairOpinion
You truly do not get it! This is a battle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party - it is socialists like Specter who hide behind the R tag and thumb their noses at conservatives. It doesn't matter if Specter wins or not the GOP still won't have real control of the Senate thanks to the other RINOs like Snowe, McCain, and Hatch. Specter is going to block most of Bush's agenda and his judicial appointments he will stab Bush in the back he had already said as much just a day after winning the primary..... Wake up and smell the friggin' coffee lady sheesh! THERE IS NO GOP CONTROL OF THE SENATE AT STAKE HERE - IT IS A SCARE TACTIC FROM THE GOP ESTABLISHMENT AT SUCKERING THE GRASSROOTS TO VOTE FOR THEIR SOCIALIST CANDIDATE!
To: FairOpinion
I'm not advocating anyone 'stay home' -- but the questions remain: (1) Is maintaining the senate in Republican hands worth continuing to give in to political extortion by a man who has never been fit to wear that label (even back in the days when he served as D.A. in Philadelphia -- that's a quarter of a century of misrepresentation)? And (2) Even if Specter were to lose, can we hold a Senate majority? and (3) Would Toomey have stood a good chance of winning against Hoeffel in November?
In my opinion, the answers are: no, yes, and yes.
17 posted on
05/01/2004 5:36:52 PM PDT by
joanie-f
(All that we know and love depends on three simple things: sunlight, soil, and the fact that it rains)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson