To: Quix
I once called Art B. to try to talk about Good's "Above Top Secret."
I think it was specifically to ask him, IIRC, about Eisenhower's meeting with an alien in 1954 in California.
Art didn't want to talk about it on the air. I think he said something like the book had been discredited.
Having said that, I have no good idea what's behind these animal mutilations. The connection to mad cow disease sounds as good or as bad as any other, I guess, except I don't for a moment believe it was carnivores or scavengers.
[Just curious, what's reference or footnote 19? What specific foreign substances have been found in the blood remnant from the carcasses?]
60 posted on
05/01/2004 2:12:19 PM PDT by
SteveH
To: Steve Hall
I think mostly ABOVE TOP SECRET was considered by those in the field as fairly solid for the time. It may have taken some hits in parts since then but I don't recall over what. I think other titles were considered less rigorously researched by Good and were considered less authoritative or believable or some such.
I think UNEARTHLY DISCLOSURE is back up there on research etc.
Footnote 19 . . :
UFOCUS, vol 2, no. 1, 1997, pp.7-11, ed. Dr Leo Sprinkle, The Institute for UFO REsearch, 1304 South College Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, originally published in CNI News, ed Michael Lindermann.
I don't know about the blood chem analysis on that score.
Certainly it's NOT predators. Actually, predators USUALLY GIVE THE CARCASSES A VERY WIDE BERTH and they take much longer than usual to decay.
63 posted on
05/01/2004 2:26:51 PM PDT by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson