Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Central Scrutiniser
Let's shrink God down to the size of one single book, written by a select set of people whose understanding was that of shepherds and fishermen; let's ignore everything else we've learned about Him from His actual creations, and be sure, while we're at it, never never never to learn any math that might tend to confuse us. Get beyond pre-algebra, and you might get into trouble. You might find yourself running into questions that can't be answered with that single book.

"Bible? We've got a Bible. We don't need ANYTHING else, including open eyelids."

There's no scientific notation if you confine yourself to the cubit. (I'm surprised that there hasn't been a fundamentalist movement to send us back to Biblical weights and measures.) Carbon dating? Now God wouldn't make anything so inconvenient as isotopes. That would confuse us. They're so small we can't see 'em, so we can ignore what they tell us. Those atheist scientists are just trying to do the Devil's work, undermining the faith of true believers--who may have to actually think about their testimony and integrate it with physical reality, if they dare question the doctrine that all true human knowledge is in Just One Book (which was a primer in morality and history, never intended to teach EVERYTHING, but never mind that.)

And those stars, they're just stuck on there. They're not so far away at all if you assume Heaven has to be beyond them. Worlds around them? WHO wants to go looking for a church that has taught, all along, that there are other worlds out there around those faraway suns?

We're gonna spend eternity just floating on clouds playing harps and singing at the Throne. Yes. That's what we want. No family, no marriage, no friendship, no service, no progression. No learning. No making, no doing...just sitting and harping and playing a horn for variety. Yeah, that's a great eternity. Forget the majesty of active volcanic fields and the heinous doctrine of plate tectonics--we won't have any use for that stuff. Forget the joy of falling in love with a kitten, a new baby. Heaven doesn't need any of that stuff--we did mention the cloud thing? You get your own, all to yourself, for eternity! Unless of course you go to that other place.

Ignore the rest of this stuff God made. Can't fit dinosaurs on the cloud you know, so they're of no possible interest.

And the notion that God is always talking to us, telling us more about Himself and His world? Why, that's the most evil thought at all. Just keep going through your prayerbooks and scripted services. Stick to the safe stuff. Don't even venture to try to ask God Himself to help you understand how it all fits together. He might answer, and maybe the answer will require you to do a little work, including (gasp) math, even PHYSICS, and that's just too big a risk to take, isn't it?
14 posted on 05/01/2004 12:03:07 AM PDT by Triple Word Score (Meretriciousness Everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Triple Word Score
Too bad DUers can't see this thread. They think we all are fundamentalists who beat our women and follow the Bible to the letter.
15 posted on 05/01/2004 12:15:08 AM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Triple Word Score
Don't yell at me, I think Creationists are the ultimate in ignorant luddite idiocy. I prefer actual science instead of well worn mumbo jumb from pre-dark ages (lack of) thought.
16 posted on 05/01/2004 12:25:49 AM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Sometimes getting some ain't worth having to sit through a Julia Robberts film.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Triple Word Score
"...we can ignore what they tell us. Those atheist scientists are just trying to do the Devil's work, undermining the faith of true believers--who may have to actually think about their testimony and integrate it with physical reality..."

Or, as my mother puts it, "now you just shush about all that..." Every question or verbalization of a concept inconsistent with traditional, literal interpretation of scripture is treated as rebelliousness.

What's amazing is there is 99% of the dialogue on their part is not a critical examination or critique of the proposed evidence, but a warning about what "going there" might lead to in terms of our faith and ultimately our morality/behavior. So shush them or use any tactic of debate to deny it, because whether the science is valid or not, if too many thought that way, we'd all just turn into savages!

While I see no reason to lower my standards of morality, my faith did crumble. But, it wasn't due to belief in the evidences of common descent, but a realization that, if they are so ready to ignore truths in the realm of science, then how open are their eyes when it comes to spiritual truths?
27 posted on 05/01/2004 1:32:03 AM PDT by Trinity_Tx (Most of our so-called reasoning consists in finding arguments for going on believin as we already do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Triple Word Score; All
Ahh, yes. Another ignorant Darwinian religious fanatic ranting...

link

... And somehow this attitude did not hinder them in their commitment to the "scientific method." In fact one of them, Sir Francis Bacon, is credited with formulating and establishing the scientific method! They seem also to have been able to maintain a proper "scientific attitude," for it was these men (Newton, Pasteur, Linnaeus, Faraday, Pascal, Lord Kelvin, Maxwell, Kepler, etc.) whose researches and analyses led to the very laws and concepts of science which brought about our modern scientific age. The mechanistic scientists of the present are dwarfed in comparison to these intellectual giants of the past. Even the achievements of an Einstein (not to mention Darwin!) are trivial in comparison. The real breakthroughs, the new fields, the most beneficial discoveries of science were certainly not delayed (in fact probably were hastened) by the creationist motivations of these great founders of modern science.

And here is a list of some of the IGNORANT, UNSCIENTIFIC, PEA-BRAINED, MORONS, according to Triple Word Score and his ilk:

TABLE I

SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES ESTABLISHED
BY CREATIONIST SCIENTISTS

DISCIPLINE SCIENTIST
ANTISEPTIC SURGERY JOSEPH LISTER (1827-1912)
BACTERIOLOGY LOUIS PASTEUR (1822-1895)
CALCULUS ISAAC NEWTON (1642-1727)
CELESTIAL MECHANICS JOHANN KEPLER (1571-1630)
CHEMISTRY ROBERT BOYLE (1627-1691)
COMPARATIVE ANATOMY GEORGES CUVIER (1769-1832)
COMPUTER SCIENCE CHARLES BABBAGE (1792-1871)
DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS LORD RAYLEIGH (1842-1919)
DYNAMICS ISAAC NEWTON (1642-1727)
ELECTRONICS JOHN AMBROSE FLEMING (1849-1945)
ELECTRODYNAMICS JAMES CLERK MAXWELL (1831-1879)
ELECTRO-MAGNETICS MICHAEL FARADAY (1791-1867)
ENERGETICS LORD KELVIN (1824-1907)
ENTOMOLOGY OF LIVING INSECTS HENRI FABRE (1823-1915)
FIELD THEORY MICHAEL FARADAY (1791-1867)
FLUID MECHANICS GEORGE STOKES (1819-1903)
GALACTIC ASTRONOMY WILLIAM HERSCHEL (1738-1822)
GAS DYNAMICS ROBERT BOYLE (1627-1691)
GENETICS GREGOR MENDEL (1822-1884)
GLACIAL GEOLOGY LOUIS AGASSIZ (1807-1873)
GYNECOLOGY JAMES SIMPSON (1811-1870)
HYDRAULICS LEONARDO DA VINCI (1452-1519)
HYDROGRAPHY MATTHEW MAURY (1806-1873)
HYDROSTATICS BLAISE PASCAL (1623-1662)
ICHTHYOLOGY LOUIS AGASSIZ (1807-1873)
ISOTOPIC CHEMISTRY WILLIAM RAMSAY (1852-1916)
MODEL ANALYSIS LORD RAYLEIGH (1842-1919)
NATURAL HISTORY JOHN RAY (1627-1705)
NON-EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY BERNHARD RIEMANN (1826- 1866)
OCEANOGRAPHY MATTHEW MAURY (1806-1873)
OPTICAL MINERALOGY DAVID BREWSTER (1781-1868)
PALEONTOLOGY JOHN WOODWARD (1665-1728)
PATHOLOGY RUDOLPH VIRCHOW (1821-1902)
PHYSICAL ASTRONOMY JOHANN KEPLER (1571-1630)
REVERSIBLE THERMODYNAMICS JAMES JOULE (1818-1889)
STATISTICAL THERMODYNAMICS JAMES CLERK MAXWELL (1831-1879)
STRATIGRAPHY NICHOLAS STENO (1631-1686)
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY CAROLUS LINNAEUS (1707-1778)
THERMODYNAMICS LORD KELVIN (1824-1907)
THERMOKINETICS HUMPHREY DAVY (1778-1829)
VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY GEORGES CUVIER (1769-1832)

 

TABLE II

NOTABLE INVENTIONS, DISCOVERIES
OR DEVELOPMENTS BY CREATIONIST SCIENTISTS

CONTRIBUTION SCIENTIST
ABSOLUTE TEMPERATURE SCALE LORD KELVIN (1824-1907)
ACTUARIAL TABLES CHARLES BABBAGE (1792-1871)
BAROMETER BLAISE PASCAL (1623-1662)
BIOGENESIS LAW LOUIS PASTEUR (1822-1895)
CALCULATING MACHINE CHARLES BABBAGE (1792-1871)
CHLOROFORM JAMES SIMPSON (1811-1870)
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CAROLUS LINNAEUS (1707-1778)
DOUBLE STARS WILLIAM HERSCHEL (1738-1822)
ELECTRIC GENERATOR MICHAEL FARADAY (1791-1867)
ELECTRIC MOTOR JOSEPH HENRY (1797-1878)
EPHEMERIS TABLES JOHANN KEPLER (1571-1630)
FERMENTATION CONTROL LOUIS PASTEUR (1822-1895)
GALVANOMETER JOSEPH HENRY (1797-1878)
GLOBAL STAR CATALOG JOHN HERSCHEL (1792-1871)
INERT GASES WILLIAM RAMSAY (1852-1916)
KALEIDOSCOPE DAVID BREWSTER (1781-1868)
LAW OF GRAVITY ISAAC NEWTON (1642-1727)
MINE SAFETY LAMP HUMPHREY DAVY (1778-1829)
PASTEURIZATION LOUIS PASTEUR (1822-1895)
REFLECTING TELESCOPE ISAAC NEWTON (1642-1727)
SCIENTIFIC METHOD FRANCIS BACON (1561-1626)
SELF-INDUCTION JOSEPH HENRY (1797-1878)
TELEGRAPH SAMUEL F.B. MORSE (1791-1872)
THERMIONIC VALVE AMBROSE FLEMING (1849-1945)
TRANS-ATLANTIC CABLE LORD KELVIN (1824-1907)
VACCINATION & IMMUNIZATION LOUIS PASTEUR (1822-1895)

28 posted on 05/01/2004 2:00:20 AM PDT by AmericaUnited (It's time someone says the emperor has no clothes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson