To: Cannoneer No. 4; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; TEXOKIE; Alamo-Girl; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
Military question, hypothetical - would our troops be better off with no armor and a strong leader who loved America, or a million armored HUMVEE'S under the leadership of UN-Clinton-Kerry?
3 posted on
04/30/2004 3:11:56 PM PDT by
Ragtime Cowgirl
(The)"enemy in Fallujah.will not be controlled.we will have to eliminate that enemy."Gen.Abizaid,4/30)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
“An army of lions led by sheep will always lose to an army of sheep led by a lion.”
6 posted on
04/30/2004 3:21:54 PM PDT by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
I'd rather fight barehanded than be under Kerry.
8 posted on
04/30/2004 3:38:52 PM PDT by
SAMWolf
(War is God's way of teaching us geography)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
We are winning ~ the bad guys are losing ~ trolls, terrorists, democ
rats and the mainstream media are sad ~ very sad!
~~ Bush/Cheney 2004 ~~ 14 posted on
04/30/2004 4:03:38 PM PDT by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
22 posted on
05/01/2004 12:07:14 AM PDT by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson