It isn't about the lawyers, it is about the strength of the evidence. The prosecution has home court advantage and people like you who are nothing more than rubber stamps who can't wait to vote guilty. Why even bother with trials?
It is interesting that Freepers are distrustful of the media in all other areas, the only exception is the media's reporting of criminal trials, which is nothing more than the prosecutions point of view.
There was a lot more to the OJ case than was ever reported by the media. It was much easier to say that OJ is rich and his lawyers played the "race card" and the jury was ignorant.
The public could understand this and then go back to watching music videos or a silly sitcom on TV or posting how guilty OJ is on some message board.
I never bother debating with some on with such an atrophied ability for intellectual debate and discussion that the only way they can communicate with someone who disagrees with them is through vitriol.
And i would be extremely curious to see how you know i would have voted guilty for anyone (since in your 'omniscience' you called me one of the 'guilty rubber-stampers').
Silly people cannot debate with someone or something they disagree with .....I personally out my rationale out there. All you did is, again using your amazing knowledge of my voting history in jury trials (or even what i thought of the OJ and Williams trials), clumped me in with whatever group of people 'the guilty rubber-stampers' belong to.
You are too silly for me to waste any more time on. Look into fish-oils and beta-carotene ....it is good for the brain.