Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Frank fan
Sigh... Once again, you miss the obvious point in your efforts to make one that doesn't matter.

I didn't say that B-Bob was the source of the revelation. But, to give you some slight benefit of the doubt, perhaps you don't think it requires taking him seriously to believe he is out scouring the market for illegal nuclear materials?

26 posted on 04/30/2004 2:18:39 PM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
I didn't say that B-Bob was the source of the revelation. But, to give you some slight benefit of the doubt, perhaps you don't think it requires taking him seriously to believe he is out scouring the market for illegal nuclear materials?

Look, I don't take Joe Wilson seriously either, but that doesn't mean the CIA didn't send him on a pretend spy mission.

Again, if you doubt the story on its face (and be my guest), that means you think one of these two people are lying:

1. Joe Wilson

2. Joe Wilson's Niger contact

But if you think either of those two are unreliable then there is no reason whatsoever for there to be a controversy over Bush's "16 words" in the first place.

Get it now?

27 posted on 04/30/2004 2:22:13 PM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson