Replies

Okay...then what about 1993 WTC and OKC bombing?

Yousef and Nichols crossed paths in the Phillipines. Mohammed was Yousef's uncle. It is interesting to note that Yousef entered the United States on an Iraqi passport and had been known among the New York fundamentalists as "Rashid, the Iraqi". Another name that could be thrown into the mix is Abdul Rahman Yasin, a U.S. citizen who moved to Iraq in the 1960's and returned to the U.S. in 1992. After the 1993 WTC bombing, Yasin fled to Iraq and was given monthly salary and housing by Saddam Hussein's regime.

Other links

They were ALL linked and the American people deserve the truth.

I just finished reading Jayna Davis's book "The Third Terrorist". Borrowed it but am going to buy it.

Never really thought there was a lot behind John Doe #2. I was wrong.

There are 24 witnesses who put John Doe #2 (who is identified) with McVeigh and Nichols. Before the OKC blast and at the scene. Including one woman who survived the blast and told doctors as they were preparing to amputate her leg to remove her from the rubble. She described John Doe #2 and his truck and his tattoo.

John Doe #2 is an ex-Iraqi soldier who worked for a Middle Eastern guy who ran a business called Salman Management. (Sort of like Salman Pak).

John Doe #2 stayed at a hotel in OK - Cactus motel I think. Same motel 3 of the 9/11 terrorists stayed at.

John Doe #2 was working at Logan Airport on 9/11 as a food handler. He is still out of prison.

The list of CIA, FBI and counter-terrorism unit heads who believe John Doe #2 worked with McVeigh and Nichols is too long to list here.

It's a must read book for Freepers. Much better than I ever thought it would be.

Okay...then what about 1993 WTC and OKC bombing?

I'm not saying that there is no link, nor am I saying these things you mention aren't true or shouldn't be pursued vigorously. What I am saying is that the need to whack Saddam was there even without WMD, even without a provable link to any terror act on our soil. We keep allowing the anti-warriors to raise the bar as to justifications for the war.

I have believed in Saddam's complicity with terror events in America from the beginning, let's face it, he would want to remain anonymous. I debate these things with my lib friends all the time, and I have fared better when I attempt to justify the war on humanitarian grounds, and on grounds that he posed a danger to us regardless, and on the pivotal psychological blow dealt to the region's penchant for terror by virtue of the humiliation factor of taking out Iraq, and the resultant restoration of respect, the lack of which caused the attack to begin with.

I'm convinced of a link, but the Left is still not buying it, and I'm not going to allow them to raise the bar to having to prove Saddam's complicity to justify the Iraq war. Let's face it, we allowed the presence of WMD to become a requirement, when it never really should have been a requirement to go to war with Iraq.