Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cop rips gutless jurors: Family rages as teen’s accused killer freed
The Boston Herald ^ | 4/30/04 | Laurel J. Sweet

Posted on 04/30/2004 6:01:59 AM PDT by Gothmog

With no evidence placing a teenager at the scene of his pregnant 14-year-old girlfriend's grisly murder, prosecutors left jurors with no choice but to acquit the 22-year-old man who admitted watching Chauntae Renee Jones die, one distraught juror said last night.

``We had to keep reminding ourselves he's innocent unless we can prove otherwise,'' the juror, who did not wish to be identified, told WCVB-TV (Ch. 5). ``It's not that he's not guilty and it's not that the defense won, it's that the prosecution couldn't make the case.''

The juror said the decision to acquit Kyle Bryant in the murders of Jones, who was eight months pregnant, and her unborn child - who were buried alive - was gut-wrenching.

``The law tied our hands, and for that, in a way, I'm grateful because the decision was not mine to make. It was only my job to match the facts to the law and what I felt and what I wanted played no part in this,'' the juror said.

Despite hearing Bryant's own audiotaped confession that on Sept. 28, 1999, he hid in a bush on the grounds of the abandoned Boston State Hospital and watched his childhood chum, Lord Hampton, now 25, choke, stab and bash Jones' head in with a rock, the jury was unconvinced that Bryant was in any way party to the murders.

``There wasn't evidence. There was no blood. There were no fingerprints. So what we felt in our gut just really didn't matter,'' she said. ``It just makes us feel awful.''

The Suffolk Superior Court jury deliberated little more than two days, during which not a single question was posed to Judge Patrick Brady, before returning the not-guilty verdicts, setting Bryant free.

``Crazy!'' one shellshocked prosecutor muttered in disbelief. ``What trial were they watching?''

What followed in the courtroom was chaos as Jones' long-suffering mother, Pamela Jones of Dorchester, had to be restrained by five court officers as she screamed, ``Don't tell me to relax! Get off of me now!''

Jones cousin, C.C. Jones, wailed and thrashed as Boston police gently held her in a futile attempt to contain her rage. ``He told me he killed her!'' C.C. Jones bellowed through tears. ``Kyle Bryant will be (expletive) dead, I promise you that!''

Sgt. Detective Daniel Keeler, who worked the case for five years, lashed out at the jury.

``You tell the disenfranchised people of this world like the Jones family the system works,'' Keeler said. ``We told them, `Don't react to the situation with violence. Wait, we've got him, he's confessed.' And now this? They believed in us and we let them down.

``There wasn't one person on that jury who couldn't say, `I'm holding out. I know he did it'? It was a total lack of civic responsibility.''

Hampton, who also has been charged with two counts of first-degree murder and will be tried separately, admits to helping bury Jones alive, but contends Bryant killed her out of fear her family would accuse him of statutory rape.

``As I'm throwing the dirt on her,'' Hampton told police, ``he's jumping up and down on her yelling, `Hurry up and die, bitch.' She gasped all the way through until she was completely buried.''

Jones was stabbed five times. One blow pierced her baby's back. An autopsy found dirt in her voice box from her suffocating final breaths.

Jurors had more than 200 pieces of evidence to consider, but in the bitter end dismissed Jones' own words from her grave in which - according to Bryant - she pleaded for his mercy.

``Kyle, help me! I love you!''

Bryant is a free man, but Jones' father, Robert Sparks, said the verdict sentenced him to a life in hell.

``All I can see is how they killed her,'' Sparks said, shaking his head. ``It's all I see. I waited five years to hear this and there's nothing I can do.''

The family's sorrow was not lost on Bryant's attorney, John Salsberg.

``I can't forget what happened to Chauntae Jones,'' Salsberg said. ``I'll never forget. (Kyle) has a life that he's going to have to start putting together again.''

Bryant's parents, Terry Baxter and Tonya Bryant, vowed to leave Boston and its bad memories far behind.

``I haven't touched (my son) since this all began,'' said Baxter, his lower lip quivering. ``We know he's not a murderer.''


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: ccjones; chauntaereneejones; judgebrady; jurynullification; kylebryant; lordhampton; patrickbrady
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Sick society. Some lib whacko at UMass calls Pat Tillman a 'Rambo thug' for dying in the service of his country, meanwhile, a MA jury lets a truly heinous person go scot free.
1 posted on 04/30/2004 6:02:00 AM PDT by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
The average Jury would aquit a murderer if the crime was on video tape.
2 posted on 04/30/2004 6:08:06 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Believe nothing you hear and half of what you see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
``Kyle Bryant will be (expletive) dead, I promise you that!''

Ping me when that happens...

3 posted on 04/30/2004 6:11:54 AM PDT by Dutchgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
"The law tied our hands, and for that, in a way, I'm grateful because the decision was not mine to make. It was only my job to match the facts to the law and what I felt and what I wanted played no part in this,'' the juror said."

Wow. What a great example of a responsible juror. He/she was "grateful" not to make a decision.
4 posted on 04/30/2004 6:12:56 AM PDT by Poundstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutchgirl
I'll git 'em, I'll git 'em


5 posted on 04/30/2004 6:15:17 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone
Aren't jurors usually asked if they will be able to come to a decision (convict or acquit) before they are seated?

If so, didn't this juror just admit that he/she was unable to perform that duty? Grounds for a retrial? I doubt it, injustice rules.
6 posted on 04/30/2004 6:17:10 AM PDT by Gothmog (The 2004 election won't be about what one did in the military, but on how one would use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
Mass. is not a state - it is a condition.
7 posted on 04/30/2004 6:20:57 AM PDT by Old Sarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
jury lets a truly heinous person go scot free.

Sounds O.J.ish doesn't it?

8 posted on 04/30/2004 6:21:42 AM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
So sad, Massachusetts is where I grew up and I left rather than take one more story like this (and be represented by Ted Kennedy)..who are these people on the jury? What does a confession mean to them? They are as disgusting as the confessed killer, may he rot in hell.
9 posted on 04/30/2004 6:23:17 AM PDT by KPfromDerryNH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutchgirl
I'll bet you won't have to wait two months.
10 posted on 04/30/2004 6:25:27 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
The jury was not convinced by the prosecution's presentation.

Why did the prosecutors try Bryant before Hampton?

Probably because they desired to try the weaker case first.

Had Bryant been "jumping up and down" on the victim, according to Hampton, then the prosecution needed to provide some extra bit(s) of evidence of that.

They did not.

Bryant should have been tried for aiding in the death of the victim, but there wasn't enough evidence to prove that he directly killed her, and that evidence is required.

The prosecution knew that going in, and the jury was instructed about the need for sufficient evidence.

Prosecutors who want to make a name for themselves, tend to over-charge defendants.

That's going to be a problem when bringing Saddam Hussein to trial. They'll try to make a big "crimes against humanity" thing out of it, when they should simply try him for the crimes for which they have a lot of evidence that he killed some people --- Saddam Hussein should be tried as a common murderous criminal and treated as one.

11 posted on 04/30/2004 6:29:26 AM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
Bryant killed her out of fear her family would accuse him of statutory rape.

I must have missed something. Why wasn't he charged with statutory rape?

12 posted on 04/30/2004 6:32:52 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
``Kyle Bryant will be (expletive) dead, I promise you that!''

'Nuff said. Justice will be served eventually.

13 posted on 04/30/2004 6:37:36 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,Election '04...It's going to be a bumpy ride,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
I don't think they'll have a problem trying Saddam for crimes against humanity. And you seem to know a lot more about what was presented than the article says. Do you have a link?

"Prosecutors who want to make a name for themselves, tend to over-charge defendants."

A gutless prosecutor would not have charged this POS with murder.

14 posted on 04/30/2004 6:38:48 AM PDT by Flightdeck (Procrastinate later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
Why wasn't he charged with statutory rape?

Because the only (presumably) witness is dead?

15 posted on 04/30/2004 6:41:28 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
The family's sorrow was not lost on Bryant's attorney, John Salsberg.

``I can't forget what happened to Chauntae Jones,'' Salsberg said. ``I'll never forget. (Kyle) has a life that he's going to have to start putting together again.''

Oh, I'm sure this scumbag is just eaten alive by remorse over getting a murderer off scot-free. Please! This has made his reputation and his fortune. Now every criminal low life in the city will want this lawyer. I bet the guy popped a bottle of champagne the evening after the verdict.

Lawyers are filth. I can't decide who I hate worse, buccaneering plaintiff's lawyers who are destroying the American economy and medical system, or silver-tongued criminal defense lawyers who get pieces of human garbage like this guy out of jail and back on the street.

How on earth can they sleep at night, knowing the damage they do to society? I guess you can justify anything if you're making millions of dollars off it. Pure scum. I don't let my kids play at other kids' houses if their dad is this kind of lawyer.

-ccm

16 posted on 04/30/2004 6:44:54 AM PDT by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
They wouldn't need the girl to testify that the man had sex with her, it seems to me. The authorities know the girl's birthdate, they can prove paternity of the baby, and the approximate date the girl was impregnated. If she was "under age" when impregnated, voila, statutory rape.
17 posted on 04/30/2004 6:46:17 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
Disgusting.
18 posted on 04/30/2004 6:48:47 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
I think they were relying on an obvious eyewitness, the dying girl on the tape identifying the scum helping kill her. I agree with the police officer, that should have been enough.
19 posted on 04/30/2004 6:52:27 AM PDT by Gothmog (The 2004 election won't be about what one did in the military, but on how one would use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
The man confessed to the murder but the jury had to wait for the god of science to tell them what to do. Back before DNA or even fingerprint evidence was used I think that a confession would of been enough to convict.

What a waste. On many, many levels.

20 posted on 04/30/2004 6:56:03 AM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson