Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Only a Few Years Late – U.N. Bans WMD Sales to Terrorists
NewsMax ^ | 4/29/04 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 04/29/2004 6:37:14 PM PDT by wagglebee

The U.N. Security Council has put terrorists, black marketeers and crooked scientists on notice that they face punishment for trafficking in weapons of mass destruction.

Seven months after President Bush called for U.N. action, the council voted unanimously Wednesday to close a loophole that allowed would-be proliferators to get nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.

International treaties now target weapons proliferation by governments - but there are no laws to prevent "non-state actors" such as terrorists, black marketeers and unscrupulous individuals and private companies from obtaining such weapons.

The resolution adopted Wednesday by the council requires all 191 U.N. member states to pass laws to prevent "non-state actors" from manufacturing, acquiring or trafficking in nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, the materials to make them, and the missiles and other systems to deliver them.

Bush called the measure an "important achievement" and urged all countries to implement it.

"We must continue to press these efforts to ensure that the world's most destructive weapons are kept from the world's most dangerous regimes and organizations," he said in a statement issued by the White House Wednesday night.

U.S. deputy ambassador James Cunningham said the resolution fulfills Bush's three goals: it criminalizes the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, requires all countries to have strong export controls, and demands that countries protect sensitive materials that can be used in weapons production.

The United States stands ready, along with other countries, to assist nations that need technical assistance to meet the resolution's requirements, he said.

All countries are required to submit a report within 90 days on the measures they are taking to implement the resolution to a committee created by the resolution.

The measure was adopted under Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter, which allows the council to impose sanctions or use force. But it makes clear that there will be no unilateral action by any country, stating that the council intends "to monitor closely the implementation" and take any further measures at a later time, which diplomats said would require a new resolution.

The Non-Aligned Movement, representing 116 mostly developing nations, strongly opposed the reference to Chapter VII, as did other countries, but Cunningham said the United States decided to keep it in because the resolution addresses "a threat to international peace and security."

Pakistan, a nuclear power and member of the movement, also objected to the whole idea of having the Security Council become involved in legislating - a concern of many other countries as well.

Until Wednesday morning, its support for the resolution was in doubt but at the last minute, it voted "yes."

Pakistan admitted in February that its leading nuclear scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan, passed technology to Iran, Libya and North Korea and the resolution was introduced as the U.N. nuclear watchdog investigates a vast underworld market in nuclear equipment and know-how that Khan spawned.

Experts have turned up black market links to Dubai, Malaysia, South Korea, Switzerland, Germany, Britain, the Netherlands and beyond.

Pakistan's U.N. Ambassador Munir Akram said his government supported the goal of keeping weapons of mass destruction from terrorists but still opposed the council trying to "legislate for the world" and take charge of global non-proliferation and disarmament issues.

Like China, he called for a treaty to prevent proliferation by non-state actors to be negotiated as soon as possible to relieve the Security Council "of the exceptional responsibilities it has assumed" under the resolution.

The five declared nuclear powers who are permanent council members - France, the United States, Britain, Russia, China _ spent months reaching agreement on a text which was then submitted to the 10 non-permanent council members and discussed with the wider U.N. membership.

"The importance of this resolution should not be underestimated," British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said in a statement. "The resolution shows that the international community is determined to respond. It makes clear that all states have a responsibility to take steps to prevent WMD proliferation."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: terror; un; wmds
THIS will have all the terrorists running for the hills, "Oh no, the UN is coming, pack the tent on the camel, we're in real trouble now."
1 posted on 04/29/2004 6:37:14 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Oh dear, I would be so afraid of what that pompous, corrupt, money grubbing, phony, poor excuse for a dignitary would have in store for a group who violates this ruling. Koffi couldn't scare a friggin flea. I doubt anyone would piss their pants knowing that little shrimp is using fighting words. Screw that pretentious jerk.
2 posted on 04/29/2004 6:47:52 PM PDT by 911 still fresh for this NYer (Koffi Korrupt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Now why be sarcastic?

Of coarse it will work.....after 16 more U.N. resolutions and the U.S declaring F*** this S***.

I'm not sure what is the best word to describe the U.N., absurd or just plain silly.
3 posted on 04/29/2004 6:55:39 PM PDT by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
the council requires all 191 U.N. member states to pass laws to prevent

This will be as effective as 5 drunken good-ol-boys at a poker party passing the same resolution.

4 posted on 04/29/2004 7:01:00 PM PDT by free2freep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free2freep
I figure in a year the UN will try to declare the US a terrorist state.
5 posted on 04/29/2004 7:05:58 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Did they forget to mention your are exempt from these laws with a few barrels of oil.
6 posted on 04/30/2004 4:38:38 AM PDT by grb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson