I agree that she is telling the total truth with regards to Islam and the goals of the Islamists. But she began with an independent clause in her opening paragraph that was not elaborated upon in the article. I mean it begged for a follow-up.
She states, "The nation of Israel is a nearly sixty year old sore spot in the present-day Middle East, it costs American taxpayers a lot of money to support (billions per year), it's the focus of dispensational Christian theology, but ... Israel can take care of itself. Really. All the US has to do is say "sic 'em" and walk away."
True, but what does Israel have to do with her subject?
Anyway, she's spot on about the Muslim world.
A.K.A. Sleepy Brown