Chiraq at it again.
1 posted on
04/29/2004 3:42:41 PM PDT by
Eurotwit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: Eurotwit
Chiraq just wants to get even for being on different sides of the fence on the Iraq war. Also by having Great Britain give up its sovernity to the EU, then there would be NO differences in policy - including who you go to war with.
37 posted on
04/29/2004 4:34:35 PM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Eurotwit
"We weel someday make America part of the EU, too,
with Sharia, and some Scottish law, truly subservient to the UN."
38 posted on
04/29/2004 4:38:59 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
(We do what we are meant to do)
To: Eurotwit
Looks like these French never never learn.
To: Eurotwit
Good, I like our friends to be our friends.
(p.s. I like the word, scuppering.)
43 posted on
04/29/2004 4:57:01 PM PDT by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
To: Eurotwit
Britain should run, while it still can, from the EU.
To: Eurotwit
"Please don't throw me into that briar patch!"
48 posted on
04/29/2004 5:32:45 PM PDT by
Freakazoid
(Freaking zoids since 1998.)
To: Eurotwit
They could become our 51st. state.
49 posted on
04/29/2004 5:39:08 PM PDT by
jslade
(People who are easily offended, OFFEND ME!)
To: Eurotwit
This is an example of why the European Union is doomed to failure. The EU goal is to run every detail in its member states, to the point of micromanagement. Outside of France, Germany, and Belgium, the EU is going to be running into varying degrees of resistance. So the EU's response to such resistance, objections to micromanagement from Brussels, what have you, will likely be Brussels getting more heavy handed, instead of reliquishing power to local control regarding local concerns. Thus, the EU will eventually collapse into a bloody mess (likely war?),
To: Eurotwit
Great Britain is too good a nation to be mixed up with those Euro-creeps. Consider for a moment that in 1940, when France was overrun by the Nazis, they not only capitulated willingly but agree to work with the Nazis for the defeat of Britain. This despite the fact that Britain vowed to fight for their liberation "to the end." When France was busy trying to surrender to Germany, the RAF tried to launch a bombing raid from a French airfield. What did the French do? They parked trucks in the middle of the runways so that the British planes couldn't take off! They didn't want to "anger" the Germans (who were in the process of destroying their country).
I can go on and on with the treachery of France. While England was left all alone to fight France's battle, the Vichy French were busy keeping their naval fleet out of British hands and actively working with the Nazis to bring on England's defeat. Still, the English continued the fight and eventually, with an assist from the USA, liberated France. The result being that the French now hate the Americans as much as the British.
I say that England should tell the EU to go screw. Instead, Great Britain ought to get together with the U.S.A., Australia, New Zealand, Canada (minus Quebec) and form an economic union of "English Speaking Countries."
I think this was a dream of Winston Churchill, perhaps the greatest man to live in the 20th century.
53 posted on
04/29/2004 5:57:03 PM PDT by
SamAdams76
(I don't own this gas-guzzling SUV - my wife does!)
To: Eurotwit
Good, let us split the EU in half, with one competing against the other. Chiraq can then curl up eating his own arms.
To: Eurotwit
What an obnoxious little wannabe dictator. Save yourself Britain! This is a golden final opportunity to avoid the Euro cesspool!
55 posted on
04/29/2004 6:46:57 PM PDT by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
To: Eurotwit
Excellent news. Better Great Britain simply not join the EU under its new constitution, than for us to have to go rescue them from military occupation by the Axis of Weasels.
To: Eurotwit
Under a"ratify-or-leave" scheme devised by the EU Commission, the 25 member states would first approve and ratify a separate treaty which gave countries two years to endorse the Constitution or give up membership. Departing states would retain their existing EU rights on trade and movement as associate members like Norway and Switzerland. And the down-side of this is?
58 posted on
04/30/2004 3:21:32 AM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
("Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one speaking the truth")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson