Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Specter Is Not Worthy of GOP Support" By Doug Patton
Free Republic Network ^ | 4-29-04 | Doug Patton

Posted on 04/29/2004 9:47:01 AM PDT by Bob J

RINO: An acronym for "Republican In Name Only." A confused creature most commonly found in the United States Senate. For more information, see "Olympia Snowe," "Lincoln Chafee" and especially "Arlen Specter." At some point, George W. Bush and his chief political advisor, Karl Rove, apparently decided that supporting so-called "mainstream" Republicans, without regard to their political ideology, was a wise political strategy. I cannot imagine why, since their previous endorsements of liberal Republicans have been embarrassing disasters.

They did it in the 2002 California governor's primary by endorsing former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan, a pro-abortion, big-government liberal, over a solid fiscal and social conservative, businessman Bill Simon. Simon won that primary but went on to lose the general election to the now-discredited Gray Davis. The president went to California to campaign for Simon, but it was too little, too late. Now the Golden State has Arnold (Kennedy) Schwarzenegger in their governor's mansion.

The White House made the same blunder that year in the Iowa GOP primary campaign for the U.S. Senate. Middle-of-the-road GOP Congressman Greg Ganske was up against a conservative ex-marine farmer named Bill Salier for the Republican nomination to run against ultra-liberal incumbent Democrat Sen. Tom Harkin in the fall. With support from the president and the party apparatus, Ganske amassed ten times the financial resources available to Salier. Nevertheless, toward the end of the primary campaign, Salier was gathering so much momentum by the sheer force of his message that Ganske was forced to call upon the White House to pull out all the stops to save him from this upstart insurgency.

Ganske won that primary, but when the smoke had cleared, he discovered he had given up 41 percent of the vote to the young firebrand. Voters who desired a real alternative to Harkin instead got, in Ganske, exactly what Salier had predicted: "liberal-lite." Harkin easily won a fourth six-year term in the United States Senate.

This year, history is repeating itself. President Bush and the GOP establishment are supporting, endorsing and promoting the candidacy of Pennsylvania's senior senator, Arlen Specter. At 74, Specter has been in the senate for 24 years. In that time, he has made a career out of wearing the Republican label while championing liberal policies that are anathema to virtually everything in his party's platform.

Known on the Hill as "Snarlin' Arlen" and "the meanest Senator in Washington," Specter is notorious for snubbing conservatives and their policies until he needs their support for re-election. His pitch is generally that for them to do otherwise might upset the delicate balance of power in the Senate. Well, this year, the pitch may not work, because Arlen Specter is facing the primary fight of his political life. This year a true Republican is in the race, a congressman named Pat Toomey, who actually supports GOP values. Imagine that.

This man would be the odds-on favorite if Specter were not running for a fifth term. But, of course, the GOP establishment won't give him the time of day. Three weeks ago, Toomey was 15 points behind in the polls. Last week, the gap had closed to five points-so alarmingly close that Specter felt the need to call upon the President of the United States to come out and personally save him from a humiliating primary loss.

Dr. Greg Ganske has gone back to his cosmetic surgery practice in Des Moines. In Los Angeles, Richard Riordan is now retired. It is my sincere hope that very soon Arlen Specter will join them in some endeavor other than that of United States Senator. On Tuesday, April 27, the voters of Pennsylvania have a chance to send a real Republican Senator to Washington, and in the process send a message to the White House: Stop endorsing RINOs! ________________________________________________________

Doug Patton is a freelance columnist who has served as a speechwriter and policy advisor for federal, state and local candidates, elected officials and public policy organizations. His weekly columns are published in newspapers across the country, and on selected Internet web sites, including www.GOPUSA.com, where he serves as the Nebraska Editor. He also writes for Talon News Service (www.TalonNews.com). Readers can e-mail him at dpatton@neonramp.com.

© 2004 Free Republic Network, Inc. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: dougpatton; frncc; patton; specter; toomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2004 9:47:02 AM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bob J
I suspect that Pennsylvania will vote for George W. Bush, but it will not re-elect Specter.
2 posted on 04/29/2004 10:05:56 AM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
Specter Is Not Worthy of GOP Support" By Doug Patton

Or more accurately:

Doug Patton Endorses Hoeffel

3 posted on 04/29/2004 10:16:36 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Doug Patton Endorses Hoeffel

So . . . a Hoeffel victory will do more for the conservative cause.

4 posted on 04/29/2004 10:19:55 AM PDT by Texas Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
I loathe Arlen Specter. However, I plan to control my emotions in the voting booth come fall. Arlen is an old man; this is his last run. Hoeffel is a young and energetic one. I want him stopped before he gains Arlen's background and influence.
5 posted on 04/29/2004 10:23:41 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Or more accurately:
Doug Patton Endorses Hoeffel

Yep, that's the same old Karl Rove flip-flop that's used to consistantly screw the conservative base each and every time. Support the RINO, then accuse conservatives of supporting the 'Rats. It's so patheticly predictable it's nauseating. I'm tired of conservative principles getting backstabbed by the neocons in this manner.

6 posted on 04/29/2004 10:24:47 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
If I were registered in Ohio I would vote for the Democrat. Specter will do NOTHING to help on the key votes for conservative judges, the most important issue in the next four years. Better to elect the Democrat and hope to get him out next time around. Far better.
7 posted on 04/29/2004 10:38:11 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Better Hoeffel than Specter.
8 posted on 04/29/2004 10:41:57 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Nice. Perfect in fact...the reality is, most Conservatives in this forum aren't, and the grassroots ability of Conservatives scares the status quo Socialists or 'Compassionate Conservatives' to death. And so we get more of the same old dead-end BS.
9 posted on 04/29/2004 10:42:59 AM PDT by ApesForEvolution (FREE 3D On-line Golf Game - Independent Reseller of the Week: http://egolfinternational.com/wig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Specter will do NOTHING to help on the key votes for conservative judges, the most important issue in the next four years.

Oh yes he will do something. He will BLOCK ALL CONSERVATIVE JUDGES. He is an untrustworthy opportunist, a snake, a weasel, whose promises are as worthless as Satan's. And we're stuck with him, thanks to Santorum and Bush, who are keeping the old boys' club together.

Conservatives should show up and vote for Bush, and also vote for Jim Clymer (Constitution Party) for U.S. Senate, or write-in Steve Friend.

10 posted on 04/29/2004 10:44:42 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Well the "good news", if it's true, is that Jim Clymer will give us an alternative to "holding our nose" or voting for Hoeffel.

After all, since, as we're *constantly* told here, the Dims outnumber the Repubs in PA, but "Snarlin' Arlen" will win, no matter what, (don't ask me to explain *that* logic ;) at least I'll have a reason to go to the polls. ;)
11 posted on 04/29/2004 10:51:01 AM PDT by Mrs. Ranger (and people wonder why I'm writing a book titled "Only in PA"? ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
This is a retrospective look at the big mistake Bush made in supporting the less well equipped candidate. Why are you turning this into a smear which equates the author's purely conservative critique of Bush's wrong headedness with this automatic incumbent support doctrine, with "supporting the liberal opponent." IT'S RETROSPECTIVE!!! Are you a believer in the 3rd way? Tell the truth.
12 posted on 04/29/2004 10:53:25 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Conservatives should show up and vote for Bush, and also vote for Jim Clymer...

LOL!
Please forgive if that struck me funny...
but good grief, I sure hope you're not talking about the infamous "Clymer".
I still need another cup of coffee before I can handle that kind of humor today.

13 posted on 04/29/2004 10:53:53 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Oh yes he will do something. He will BLOCK ALL CONSERVATIVE JUDGES. He is an untrustworthy opportunist, a snake, a weasel, whose promises are as worthless as Satan's. And we're stuck with him, thanks to Santorum and Bush, who are keeping the old boys' club together

While you all are dealing with the individual this "Two-Party Cartel"' bought & paid for by the elites, that have no desire in a conservative agenda being put forth, continually erode us to serfdom. BOTH parties are equally responsible. Their allegience is to each others party & NONE to us individuals. They BOTH must be eliminated.

14 posted on 04/29/2004 10:58:01 AM PDT by Digger (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Hey, uhh, Doug, why do you think Bush supported Riordan over Simon? Simon LOST to Gray Davis. Riordan would have won. That's pretty simple now isn't it? Now, apply the same logic to Arlen Specter and you can see support for Specter by the White House was an astute political move.
15 posted on 04/29/2004 10:58:08 AM PDT by Solson (Conservatives are concerned with the'end'; Liberals about the 'means' and the 'particulars.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solson
Riordan would have won.

Riordan is to the left of Schwarzenegger. It would not have been worth electing him.

16 posted on 04/29/2004 11:08:12 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Digger
I disagree. We should support Bush because he is the lesser of two evils. But in Specter's case, Hoeffel is the lesser of two evils because he won't be judiciary chairman. The NRSC should spend its money in the South, where we can get some real Republicans elected and make up for Pa.

You can't cut off your nose to spite your face if you don't have a nose. There's nothing to lose in this election, because Specter is not worth electing.

17 posted on 04/29/2004 11:12:51 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
So it can be assumed, can it not, you believe GRay Davis performed better for California than a Riordan Governorship would have?
18 posted on 04/29/2004 11:13:19 AM PDT by Solson (Conservatives are concerned with the'end'; Liberals about the 'means' and the 'particulars.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
If Bush wins Pa., Specter is in. If he doesn't, Specter is out. Don't expect conservative Dems or city blacks to split their ticket for him.

FWIW, I'm just pulling the R lever.

19 posted on 04/29/2004 11:15:37 AM PDT by Tribune7 (Vote Toomey April 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson