A "W" and Kerry debate would be kind of like going to the dentist and getting the "laughing gas." You know you have to go, or should go, to the dentist (watch the debate), but you also know that if it gets really painful, there's always the "laughing gas" (I'll probably get a keg for the first debate)!
Correct, Hillary is no debater. She hides behind scripts and minions. If she ever debates Bush on anything and pulls that "he invaded my space" bull she used during the Lazio debate, I hope she is laughed out of the room, out of the Senate and out of the serious political landscape. That was a real weenie tactic and showed a weak spot a mile wide. Lazio is a good man and did what he could; Bush would fare better...after all, he bested Ann Richards.
Now you're talking! :-)
You hit ever point and knocked every nail squarely on the head!
Kerry is pompous,more wooden then algore(which is almost an impossibility,but he's managed to do it),and so ennui inducing,that even yellow dog Dims,would be crying "UNCLE",long before the first debate was 1/3 of the way done.
And yes,W outmaneuvered Ma Richards and Hillary isn't anywhere near the "debater" Ma was.
Now,it's up to US,to get out from behind our screens,get involved in real life,convert the fence sitters,get out the vote,and give our time,money,and effort to help reelect President Bush come November.:-)