Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quidnunc
The result of this is that Kerry will have to perform a political high wire act similar to that attempted by Willkie sixty-four years ago.

The trouble for Kerry is that he doesn't have the political dexterity to perform a high wire act. It's hard to walk a high wire with one foot in your mouth.

3 posted on 04/28/2004 3:01:11 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: My2Cents
It's hard to walk a high wire with one foot in your mouth.

HA!HA!..LOL! :)

4 posted on 04/28/2004 3:12:53 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: My2Cents
I think the problem with John Moser's analysis---only a small one---is that there is NO historical evidence that Robert Taft would have done a bit better against FDR. The Republicans had ONE chance in 1940---to begin sounding the claxons of interventionism in Europe, and thus they would have looked like wise men when war did come. But, of course, Taft wouldn't do that either. Thus, even if the GOP would have lost in 1940, it had a chance, by moving to the "right of FDR on the war, to win in 1944. Regrettably, they ceded that through isolationism.
5 posted on 04/28/2004 4:03:03 PM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson