Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Amerigomag
Public-supported infrastructure? Of what? Electro-magnetic waves? The only cost is to the broadcasters buying the rights from the FCC to use them.

On the other hand, who do you think builds the towers, the buildings, buys the equipment, pays the personnel to produce the programs, and the royalties to the artists they play? Here's a clue: It ain't the taxpayers.

19 posted on 04/28/2004 4:56:50 PM PDT by Mr Ducklips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Ducklips
The only cost is to the broadcasters buying the rights from the FCC to use them.

Correct.

...and it's high time that others who profit from the public goodwill and still claim the status of an injured party pay their share as well.

They can't have it both ways. Government support of their livelihood and protection when the rest of the public enjoys those same benefits.

The issue at hand is use of a publicly licensed communication medium, not theft of work product. If it were a simple case of theft of work product, we would have all been sued years ago for giving Christmas presents to our children.

As I said in my original reply: Screw RIAA!

20 posted on 04/28/2004 5:31:08 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson