Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Canadian Volunteer
"Seriously though, 4 years ago, Global Television got a license to re-broadcast Fox News as part of Fox News Canada, the proviso being that there would have to be some Canadian content, something that doesn't seem out of line.

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/eng/Decisions/2000/DB2000-565.htm"

Thanks for the link. While I don't agree that the CRTC's attempts to protect and promote Canadian content are productive or useful, this does show that this is not about keeping certain viewpoints out of the Canadian market.
33 posted on 04/29/2004 8:55:20 AM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: -YYZ-
Said YYZ,

"While I don't agree that the CRTC's attempts to protect and promote Canadian content are productive or useful, this does show that this is not about keeping certain viewpoints out of the Canadian market."

What makes you say that? What would you suggest as an alternative? Or do you really have any interest in hearing a Canadian voice on Canadian airwaves? Do you ever think of how different the broadcast spectrum would be if Canadian broadcasters didn't get all this subsidized product from the States?

And for the Americans here, how do you think you would react if 90% of the film and television that you see was from, say, England because the American networks found it much cheaper to acquire, even though the situations and characters didn't particularly reflect American values or situations? Wouldn't your nose be just a little out of joint and do you really think that Americans wouldn't go down a similar path as we have with the CRTC?
34 posted on 04/29/2004 9:27:13 AM PDT by Canadian Volunteer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson