To: dyed_in_the_wool
"Violent military action by an occupying power against inhabitants of an occupied country will only make matters worse," he said. "It's definitely time, time now for those who prefer restraint and dialogue to make their voices heard."
Well Koffi, the majority or the insurgents are not from Iraq. They are from Syria, Iran, Chechnya and other parts of the globe. They came in to fight the US because they do not want a democracy.
Now Koffi, we know you support terrorists, communists and butchers and we also know you hate democracy and are a corrupt POS.
So worry about more important things like explaining to the world why you let Saddam murder his countrymen while you took his money.
10 posted on
04/28/2004 11:55:02 AM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(60 Senate seats changes America.)
To: EQAndyBuzz
What is the sense having the UN. This organization was founded on the priniciples of promoting world peace. They have Peacekeeper's who can't keep peace because they believe in non-aggression. If the UN did their job, upheld their obligations and dealt with Saddam sooner...I don't think we would be in Iraq right now. But again, the UN never has enough money for Peacekeeping...the US would be footing the bill,and providing our military but UNANNAN will be in command. I don't think Kerry realize this if we let UN take control of Iraq. People think were in a mess now, just wait for the UN to really muck things up with US taxpayer's money.
33 posted on
04/28/2004 3:35:45 PM PDT by
Milligan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson