The statistics I've seen were from cross-state and cross-country research. If you have a study that shows that there is an opposite effect in Oklahoma, I would be very interested in seeing it. Although it is possible that there could be statistical aberrations from the overall effect, such a large one would be very unlikely. But again, there is a big difference between "sex before marriage" and this subset of wholesale sluttery. Even defending the first case wouldn't do anything to improve the level of hope one could have for the futures of these train-tunnel-tramps.
You just do not like the fact that because we live in a society that is free, and not under some Islamic Vice and Virtue police, or the Vatican, or the Southern Baptist doctrine, people will do what they want.
Your straw-man argument that I would prefer to live under religious law is both factually wrong and logically inept. Nowhere in this thread have I stated anything about law or religion. The behavior these tramps are advocating is morally wrong, it's that simple. Even an atheist can call this whorish behavior for what it is. Fraudulently misstating my motivations and then attacking them rather than critiquing the actual statements I've made undermines both your defense of these snot dumpsters and your own credibility.
It must just annoy you beyond words that people can have fun that you don't approve of, and that will never change.
Actually, it saddens me to see people like this hurt themselves and others with this whorish self-destruction. Most people deeply regret anonymous sex with strangers, it's those who don't who deserve the most pity.
I noticed you are yet another who only faults the women in this article, not the men who are having sex with them.
I've called them for what they are, but it isn't their promiscuity that I am fundamentally attacking. By creating this organization and publicizing it on a website, they are attempting to defend and ultimately recruit others into their downward spiral of loveless sex with strangers. As I keep saying, these pathetic women were sluts long before the war and they almost certainly will be sluts long after the war. To publicly defend this depraved form of complimentary prostitution as being a valid form of patriotism is an offense to everyone who truly served their country.
First of all, Pollyanna, get over your terms. Not all sex is about flowers, hearts, puppy dogs, and making adorable wittle babies. Even married people have sex that has nada to do with love and everything to do with lust.
Although it is possible that there could be statistical aberrations from the overall effect, such a large one would be very unlikely.
It could also be that they are feeling as though they must marry, because of religious beliefs, and then discovering marriage was not all its cracked up to be.
The behavior these tramps are advocating is morally wrong, it's that simple
Morally wrong to you. You keep forgetting that part. Not everyone shares your morals, and only those that advocate religious law seem to think their morals should be shared by everyone.
As I keep saying, these pathetic women were sluts long before the war and they almost certainly will be sluts long after the war.
Guess the guys will be pigs too, right?
Well, you aren't hanging my mind, nor am I changing yours. I am just happy I live somewhere that holds freedom higher than a certain segment of the population's alleged morals.