Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nat Hentoff: Pickering's Reputation Restored
Jewish World Review ^ | 4/26/04 | Nat Hentoff

Posted on 04/28/2004 8:30:41 AM PDT by blitzgig

Edited on 04/28/2004 8:38:17 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

For two years, Federal District Court Judge Charles Pickering, a Mississippi Republican, has suffered continuous character assassination by Senate Democrats who have filibustered his nomination by President Bush to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. He is on that bench now only because of a temporary recess appointment.

The assaults on the judge have been led by Sen. Charles Schumer of New York, who has accused him of "glaring racial insensitivity." And NAACP National Chairman Julian Bond proclaimed that "a vote for Pickering is a vote against civil rights."

Most damaging has been the charge — carelessly circulated nationwide by many in the media — that Pickering went to extraordinary lengths 10 years ago to lessen the sentence for one of three white men who burned a cross at the home of an interracial couple in Mississippi. But, at last, in a March 28 "60 Minutes" segment, Mike Wallace restored Pickering's reputation in a report from Mississippi showing 16 million CBS viewers the actual facts of Pickering's record — on and off the bench.

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: charlespickering; charlesschumer; judges; judiciary; mikewallace; nathentoff

1 posted on 04/28/2004 8:30:42 AM PDT by blitzgig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blitzgig
If you can't beat em, smear em.
2 posted on 04/28/2004 9:09:27 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blitzgig
Mike Wallace, CBS, and 60 Minutes usually don't get good reviews here. But it seems to me they did their job on this one.
3 posted on 04/28/2004 9:09:48 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I, for one, won't ever forget the DREADFUL way John Edwards treated this man during those hearings.
4 posted on 04/28/2004 9:12:14 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blitzgig
At long last, Sen. Schumer, have you no sense of decency?

Oh that one's easy. NO.

5 posted on 04/28/2004 9:35:51 AM PDT by Timocrat (I Emanate on your Auras and Penumbras Mr Blackmun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF
This is major-league CYA by CBS and 60 Minutes for the Dems.

Now that Pick is a judge, CBS is telling Chuckie and the Dems "don't try to remove him, or you'll embarrass yourselves."

One side-effect of this may that Pick gets selected to fill a Supremes vacancy late in Bush's second term. CBS has cleared the field for him. Any attempt to smear him will be negated by the 60 Minutes report.
6 posted on 04/28/2004 9:54:07 AM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
That would be great...some of those Supreme Court judges seem more than ready to retire.
7 posted on 04/28/2004 6:09:09 PM PDT by foreshadowed at waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blitzgig
The last two paragraphs are the best:

As for Charles Schumer, the Democrats' hitman on Pickering — he told Wallace that "the bottom line is if Judge Pickering were so sensitive to the long and sad racial history in Mississippi, he would never have done what he did with the case of cross-burning."


Paraphrasing what a defense attorney said to Joe McCarthy in the Army-McCarthy hearings on alleged communists in our land: At long last, Sen. Schumer, have you no sense of decency?

8 posted on 04/28/2004 6:12:33 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
I like your insight as to what this 60 minutes piece may be setting up--possible Supreme Court appointment. However, that only sets my suspicious mind working and wondering is there soemthing Souter-like about Pickering?

I am not ready to concede that 60 minutes did their restoration piece on Pickering for solely good motives. How does Pickering stand on judicial issues as far that would be importnat to conservatives?

9 posted on 04/28/2004 9:38:02 PM PDT by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ontos-on
I don't know the details of Pickering's positions. Someone will have to help me with that one.

I'm suggesting that what 60 Minutes did was to tell the Democrats "don't try to undo his recess appointment; it won't work." The SIDE-EFFECT of that effort (which is not altruistic, it's just meant to prevent Democrats, who are very good at imploding in situations like these, from doing so) is to perhaps give Pick an all-clear to a later Supreme nomination.
10 posted on 04/28/2004 9:57:55 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson