Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Former Proud Canadian
I agree with you on this. I have been expecting Bush to get close to a 50 state sweep since early this year, when Dean was the Democrat candidate. I still believe its possible with JohnEffinKerry running against Bush. Most importantly, I have said all along that the polls are absolute bullshit, absolute lies thrown out there by the left wing media to push the populace into supporting Kerry. I expect as the election nears you'll see the left wing media back off from their preposterous misrepresentations of the facts, just so they have a smidgin of credibility to continue to sell their mendacious rags and try to save what little TV news viewing audience that remains.
67 posted on 04/28/2004 5:40:34 AM PDT by vanmorrison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: vanmorrison
I don't think the polls have been anywhere near accurate since 1980. That's when the "special sauce" started to be added and people being polled got so fed up they started lying to the pollsters.

Edwards would have been a much tougher candidate. Even Dean would have been better, although he would have been hard pressed to muster 100 electoral votes. Kerry is a complete, unmitigated disaster for the dems. He ignites no passion, he makes no sense. He doesn't even look like he wants the job. His popularity will slide as November approaches. The only people who will bother to vote for him will be the ultra dem/libs and the hate Bushes. 30% of the electorate, tops. Not enough to win a single state.

122 posted on 04/28/2004 7:47:11 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson