1 posted on
04/27/2004 9:53:14 PM PDT by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: kattracks
I suppose he can leave God out. God will probably end up leaving him out, after all.
(He's an extreme embarrassment to those of us who live in Washington.)
To: kattracks
Rep. Pete Sessions, Texas Republican, accused Mr. McDermott of "embarrassing the House" Embarrassing the house? Bagdhad Jim's an embarrassment to an entire nation.
4 posted on
04/27/2004 9:58:15 PM PDT by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: kattracks
Rep. Pete Sessions, Texas Republican, accused Mr. McDermott of "embarrassing the House" Baghdad Jim is an embarrassment to the citizens of the state of Washington and to all Americans.
8 posted on
04/27/2004 10:00:50 PM PDT by
lonevoice
(Some things have to be believed to be seen)
To: kattracks
McDermott is a strange duck. He seems dead set on being charged with either treason or .... who knows? If anyone says that you shouldn't question his patriotism, ask "What patriotism? I've never seen any evidence that he possesses any."
To: kattracks
Why didn't he just refuse to lead?
If the Godless man wants to omit the only one who loves him no matter what, then it is his soul that is lost. But this jerk lead the whole room!
IMHO He just wanted the nation to talk about him.
Look At Me! Look At Me!
17 posted on
04/27/2004 10:19:13 PM PDT by
GottaLuvAkitas1
(What a Tangled Web We Weave . .when first we practice to deceive!)
To: kattracks
Interesting politician
You'd think he would LIE about honoring God, just to get elected.
Maybe he's just foolishly thinks that the majority of Americans are atheists.
SURPRISE, Mr. McDumbit!
26 posted on
04/27/2004 10:30:59 PM PDT by
FixitGuy
To: CyberCowboy777; Chad Fairbanks; Libertina; Eala; cmsgop
Commie Jim ping.
To: kattracks
Sorry to say McDermott is from my state and I believe he is the reason that Washington State thinks their waters are so polluted. He keeps drooling in them.
To: kattracks
Summary: The House of Representatives voted on October 8 to pass a resolution that affirms our nation?s commitment to keeping "under God" in the Pledge.
On a vote of 401-5, the House of Representatives voted on October 8 to reaffirm our country's commitment to keeping 'under God' in the Pledge. The resolution, S. 2690, also reaffirmed our national motto, 'In God We Trust.'
The five members who voted against this resolution are: Barney Frank (D-MA), Michael Honda (D-CA), Jim McDermott (D-WA), Bobby Scott (D-VA), and Pete Stark (D-CA).
Four other members just voted 'present.' They are: Gary Ackerman (D-NY), Earl Blumenauer, (D-OR), Nydia Velazquez, (D-NY) and Mel Watt (D-NC).
To: kattracks
This old fool didn't omit, Under God, by accident. I saw it on tv, and he remained silent when it got to that phrase. He would have continued on, without pause, if he truly forget that Under God was part of the Pledge.
44 posted on
04/27/2004 10:57:36 PM PDT by
Jenya
To: kattracks
To: kattracks
I have no problem with this.
If his loyalty to Country is greater than his loyalty to God; SO BE IT.
Kids should be allowed to express the order of their loyalties too! With or Without "under God"; The Pledge & its "patriotism message" is valid for America's kids.
47 posted on
04/27/2004 11:02:22 PM PDT by
PizzaDriver
(an heinleinian/libertarian)
To: kattracks
Mike DeCesare, said his boss "hesitated, unsure of what he should do because the words 'under God' are under court review." Then tell his bungholiness that until a court ruling comes out, people with a brain continue as usual.
58 posted on
04/27/2004 11:23:21 PM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Proud member of the right wing extremist Neanderthals.)
I am shocked. Shocked, I tell you! Shocked and appalled. Shocked and appalled, and appalled and shocked. Shockingly appalled. Appallingly shocked. Shockingly shocked! Appallingly appalled!
61 posted on
04/27/2004 11:37:57 PM PDT by
jennyp
(http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
To: kattracks
When asked about yesterday's Pledge incident, Mr. McDermott's spokesman, Mike DeCesare, said his boss "hesitated, unsure of what he should do because the words 'under God' are under court review." LIAR .. McDermott knew he would get a reaction and that is why he did it
62 posted on
04/27/2004 11:40:53 PM PDT by
Mo1
(Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
To: kattracks
McDermott is simply a pig who no longer deserves to live under the protective umbrella of our country. If wishes only had wings....
63 posted on
04/28/2004 12:25:45 AM PDT by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: kattracks
Even if the USSC makes the mistake of removing "under God" from schools, there is NO EXCUSE for removing "under God" from adult recitations.
Remeber when the USSC convenes, part of the Oyez Oyez includes "may God have mercy upon this honorable court".
McDermont is just having trouble because he is trying to put himself as equal in importants to the almighty.
To: kattracks
Oh, why bother with the pledge at all. Even "One nation, indivisible" is a mockery with the way the US is getting more and more balkanized.
OK, before you all jump on me, this is exaggeration for effect.
To: kattracks
"Washington Democrat"
Please, Washington, stop sending these liberal idiots to D.C.
67 posted on
04/28/2004 1:22:24 AM PDT by
Rocky
(To the 9/11 Commission: It was Al Qaeda, stupid!)
To: kattracks
McDermott is one, big horse's ass. There is absolutely zip for excuse for such despicable, childish behavior. If he doesn't like what this country stands for, tell him to get the hell out.
And for Heaven's sake, Washington State, would you people WAKE UP and fire this moron next election, once and for all?????
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
