Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SierraWasp
You would think at least the 5 counties directly involved would take a position. But... no guarantees they'd be on the correct side of the argument, unfortunately. Any thinking person with respect for the Constitution should oppose this.

I posted the article to the earlier Sierra Umbrella thread, for reference.

12 posted on 04/27/2004 6:06:04 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: calcowgirl
No one knows how many counties are directly involved!!! No geographical boundaries are presented in either piece of putrid proposed legislation... that's the stealthy part of it!!!

Laird's bill refers to "watersheds!" Well heck, they can be deemed to extend all the way to the danged sea!!! Somebody's got their head so far up their own EnvironMental agenda that they need a glass bellybutton in order to have any vision. Actually... They need a tunnel to match their vision!!!

14 posted on 04/27/2004 10:05:41 PM PDT by SierraWasp (What's the Magnitude and the Amplitude or your Attitude of Gratitude... Dude? USA! USA! USA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson