To: Thud
I had a journalism professor in college who pointed out the following:
In the "old days," journalists were people who studied things other than journalism. They were intelligent, well rounded, people who knew about the world. Most of them held jobs outside of journalism for at least part of their lives.
By contrast the "modern" journalist is someone who went to college to be a journalist and that's all they know.
Basically, the modern journalist is a poorly educated "elitist."
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Good points:
In the "old days," journalists were people who studied things other than journalism. They were intelligent, well rounded, people who knew about the world. Most of them held jobs outside of journalism for at least part of their lives.
By contrast the "modern" journalist is someone who went to college to be a journalist and that's all they know.
Basically, the modern journalist is a poorly educated "elitist."
53 posted on
04/27/2004 10:22:09 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(NFL Owners: Grown men don't watch hollywood peep shows with wives and children.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
It's interesting that you should mention that....it dawned on me one day and I have to say, it's jaded every news report I've heard since then.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
"Basically, the modern journalist is a poorly educated "elitist."
...with kneepads.
61 posted on
04/28/2004 10:15:51 AM PDT by
WorkingClassFilth
(So what are you expecting from NPR - the truth?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson