Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
Here's a blast from the past--


9/11 Bombshell: Judge Rules Saddam Trained Hijackers [Salman Pak]
Newsmax ^ | 5/9/03 | Newsmax wires

Posted on 05/09/2003 7:47:49 AM CDT by =Intervention=

In a bombshell finding virtually ignored by the American media, a U.S. District Court judge in Manhattan ruled Wednesday that Salman Pak, Saddam Hussein's airplane hijacking school located on the outskirts of Baghdad, played a material role in Sept. 11's devastating attacks on America.

The ruling renders moot complaints from Bush administration critics that the U.S. has so far failed to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, since an official verdict that Baghdad was complicit in the attacks provides more than enough justification for the decision to topple Sadism Hussein's regime.

In reporting Judge Harold Baer's $104 million judgment against Hussein and Osama bin Laden, only the Philadelphia Inquirer and the Chinese news service Xinhua mentioned Salman Pak by name.

But according to courtroom testimony by three of the camp's instructors, the facility was a virtual hijacking classroom where al Qaeda recruits practiced overcoming U.S. flight crews using only small knives - a terrorist technique never employed before 9/11.

At least one veteran of Salman Pak, Sabah Khodad, has maintained that the 9/11 hijackers were actually trained by Saddam's henchman. He told PBS in Oct. 2001 that the World Trade Center attack "was done by graduates of Salman Pak."

The Inquirer called the finding "dramatic," noting that it was the first legal claim tying Baghdad to America's darkest day.

Meanwhile, the New York Times and the Washington Post, which opposed the war in Iraq, have so far declined to report the first official ruling linking Saddam to 9/11.

The ruling represents a huge victory, not only for the families of Timothy Soulas and George Eric Smith - the two 9/11 victims in whose name the suit was brought - but for former CIA Director James Woolsey, one of the earliest proponents of the Salman Pak-9/11 connection.

His authoritative testimony, backed by satellite photos showing a Russian-built Tupolev 54 airliner parked in the middle of an open field, offered key support for lawyer James Beasley's argument that Salman Pak played a role in attacks.

Beasley told the Inquirer that persuading the court about the link was "a hell of a hurdle to get over."

One significant obstacle faced by the Philadelphia lawyer was that Woolsey's successor at the CIA, George Tenet, has never included Salman Pak among evidence tying Iraq to al Qaeda - and has publicly denied that Baghdad played any role whatsoever in the 9/11 attacks.

Tenet's decision to ignore the critical role played by the camp is said to be based, in part, on friction between the CIA and the Iraqi National Congress, which helped several Salman Pak veterans defect to the U.S. and made them available to the media.

Tenet's opposition is believed to have been key in the decision by the Bush administration not to spotlight Iraq's 9/11 role, leaving White House officials with the sole argument that Saddam Hussein threatened the U.S. with weapons of mass destruction.

But as the postwar search for WMD's enters its fourth week without any major find, some now fear that the Bush administration's decision to side with Tenet over Woolsey on Salman Pak is shaping up as a major political blunder.
Source

Somewhere on FR, there are actual pictures of the site. Yet some people continue to go off on these "there's no connection" tangents. (shaking head)

52 posted on 04/27/2004 7:15:50 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious
I know. They are fun to play with for a while, watching their denials grow and their spin wind its way through a thread. Then it all gets so Clintonian and we get tired of it all.
53 posted on 04/27/2004 7:16:49 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious; Peach

59 posted on 04/27/2004 7:26:31 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious
The CIA has known about Salman Pak since the 1980s. It was Chalabi's men, who were later discredited by the CIA, and Douglas Feith that over-ruled our country's intelligence apparatus and spread their lies in a friendly media.

And who really cares what a radical leftwing judge from New York says? Just who's side are you on? Bush rejects Saddam 9/11 link

Rumsfeld sees no link between Saddam, 9/11

No Iraq link to 9/11: Rummy, Rice say it isn't so No links to Saddam, al-Qaeda pair claim
Iraq-al Qaeda links weak, say former Bush officials
Leaked report rejects Iraqi al-Qaeda link
Bush overstated Iraq links to al-Qaeda, former intelligence officials say

“The chairman of the monitoring group appointed by the United Nations Security Council to track Al Qaeda told reporters that his team had found no evidence linking Al Qaeda to Saddam Hussein.” [NY Times, 6/27/03]

"U.S. allies have found no links between Iraq and Al Qaeda.'We have found no evidence of links between Iraq and Al Qaeda,' said Europe's top investigator. 'If there were such links, we would have found them. But we have found no serious connections whatsoever.’" [LA Times, 11/4/02]

Experts scorn Saddam link to al-Qaeda
Experts doubt Iraq, al-Qaeda terror link

77 posted on 04/27/2004 8:04:35 AM PDT by JohnGalt (Chalabi Republicans: Soft on Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson