To: b4its2late
Hah! It's not just the libs, there are plenty on this site who are doing the spewing--even though there were threads about Salman Pak (clue: it's in Iraq, and it trains aspiring terrorists how to hijack airliners) on FR for ages.
I think some people will not be satisfied unless we somehow produce a fully-armed and ready to go nuclear warhead in the possession of a certified, authentic, card-carrying AlQaeda terrorist.
46 posted on
04/27/2004 7:03:40 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: MizSterious
It's not just the libs, there are plenty on this site who are doing the spewingTrue. But I don't have enough space to list them all, so "libs" encompasses a majority....
143 posted on
04/27/2004 9:09:49 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(If you look like your passport picture, you probably need the trip.)
To: MizSterious
I think some people will not be satisfied unless we somehow produce a fully-armed and ready to go nuclear warhead in the possession of a certified, authentic, card-carrying AlQaeda terrorist. But of course there is no such thing. They do not carry "cards" or anything of the sort. And if we produced actionable evidence that an (ALLEGED) AQ person was armed by Saddam, the new talking-point would be "but he wasn't REALLY an Al Qaeda member". Or, it would be "but he could have gotten the warhead from someone else".
Anything to argue against an invasion of Iraq. For some reason.
To: MizSterious
I'm waiting for that. The left will claim W had the weapons planted.
265 posted on
04/27/2004 4:15:40 PM PDT by
satchmodog9
(it's coming and if you don't get off the tracks it will run you down)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson