Yes, we've established that, it's "but one" reason. In other words, it's one of the reasons in your mind not to support the war against Iraq.
Again, it logically follows that the same would be true of the American Revolution. That it was "debt financed" is one of the reasons not to support it. Right?
Conservative Christians can't support aggressive, elective wars
Evidently, they can.
Conservative Westerners do not believe violations of UN resolutions is cause interventions in sovereign nations, in the spirit of the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia.
Evidently, some of them do.
Your failure in logic is tying any national security consequences to your debt financing
I granted you debt financing = bad. How many times do you want me to say it.
The welfare at home, the Amnesty for 9 million actual invaders, and the increased centralization of the national security apparatus even after its most spectacular failure are all anti-conservative developments
Even if true, not relevant to what's under discussion.
Hmmm, 12/2001 and Ansar al-Islam sets up shop in the US controlled No Fly Zone to organize a force to take down Saddam? Something is rotten in Denmark.
That would explain the protection money....