Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
So you side with Chalabi's unproven asserstions about Salman Pak and against the assessment of the United States Intelligence services?

You are of course aware of the assessment the CIA gave on Salman Pak aren't you?
136 posted on 04/27/2004 9:06:42 AM PDT by JohnGalt (Chalabi Republicans: Soft on Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: JohnGalt
I'm still waiting for your proof that Salman Pak wasn't what it was claimed to be. The link you provided merely mentioned that information about it had been included in the reports.
139 posted on 04/27/2004 9:09:10 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
You are of course aware that Salmon Pak was used to train terrorists to hijack planes. Don't bother to deny this central fact.

Whether or CIA goofed up at some point in regard to Salmon Pak does not take away from the central point that terrorists of all stripes trained there to do pretty much what happened on 9/11.
140 posted on 04/27/2004 9:09:16 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson