[MizSterious]

"...sometimes you need to read between the lines..."

READ BETWEEN THE LINES? So, someone came up with an exact quote, and you choose to insist it means something the person never said, because you read between the lines.

Since when is "reading between the lines" considered valid proof for anyone's point? I can "read between the lines" of any article, and state, emphatically, that in so doing, I know there are little green men walking on the Moon who are directing Earth's affairs via special mental rays. I would know this is true because I read between the lines."

Sorry, JG, this most recent argument is really one of your silliest. Ever.

[Peach]

I'm reading that the smell of vindication in the morning will make the naysayers vanish for a while before their foolishness is enough to start its own thread.