Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LexBaird
That was a good answer. I gave one as well, although not as good as yours.

The naysayers never have an answer for Salmon Pak, I notice.

They just change the goalposts.
106 posted on 04/27/2004 8:47:46 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Peach
I wrote a liitle essay on this a couple of weeks ago: Why are we in Iraq?
115 posted on 04/27/2004 8:57:43 AM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: Peach; JohnGalt
The naysayers never have an answer for Salmon Pak, I notice.

I gather from JohnGalt's posts that his "answer" is that we cannot put any stock whatsoever in anything this guy says, because he's associated with Ahmed Chalabi. Like, he was just misquoted by his translator, or something. (LOL) And let's not forget he is associated somehow with Chalabi so everything he says, even "2+2=4", is a lie. Did I mention he's associated with Chalabi somehow? Chalabi!!!

Seems pretty weak to me but I guess that's the best anti Salman Pak talking-point they've got at this point.

223 posted on 04/27/2004 11:23:36 AM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson