To: tortoise
An ark placed on the top of the mountain in biblical times would have been a pile of timber at the bottom of the mountain thousands of years ago. Human reasoning, placed above the Biblical account, eventually becomes a pile of rubble, crushed beneath the steadfast Word of God.
4 posted on
04/26/2004 11:39:05 PM PDT by
Prince Caspian
(Don't ask if it's risky... Ask if the reward is worth the risk)
To: Prince Caspian
Haved spent some time up here in Alaska up above treeline in the rocks & ice. Might see some sheep, pikas, or marmots; but this just looks like granite to me.
6 posted on
04/26/2004 11:56:04 PM PDT by
Eska
To: Prince Caspian
Human reasoning, placed above the Biblical account, eventually becomes a pile of rubble, crushed beneath the steadfast Word of God. That's nice. Where in the Bible does it say that the Ark would continue to exist for thousands of years after the flood?
15 posted on
04/27/2004 6:30:16 AM PDT by
Modernman
(Work is the curse of the drinking classes. -Oscar Wilde)
To: Prince Caspian
The Word of God says "Mountains of Ararat", not "Mt. Ararat". There is more than one mountain there, and it is very unlikely that Noah just happened to "hit the top of a peak". But what does a little precision in language matter?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson